Analyzing the Power of Chain of Thought through Memorization Capabilities

arXiv — cs.LGTuesday, November 4, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
Recent research highlights the chain of thought (CoT) technique as a promising approach to enhance large language models' mathematical reasoning capabilities. Studies indicate that CoT can improve performance on complex mathematical problems by enabling models to generate intermediate reasoning steps. However, the extent to which CoT benefits transformers across the full spectrum of reasoning tasks remains uncertain and is currently under investigation. While initial findings suggest improvements in specific domains, it is not yet clear if these gains generalize to all types of reasoning challenges faced by large language models. Ongoing analysis aims to clarify whether CoT consistently enhances model performance or if its advantages are limited to particular problem categories. This nuanced understanding is crucial for developing more robust and versatile AI reasoning systems. The evolving research landscape continues to explore the potential and limitations of CoT within the broader context of transformer-based models.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
Explaining Generalization of AI-Generated Text Detectors Through Linguistic Analysis
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv investigates the generalization capabilities of AI-generated text detectors, revealing that while these detectors perform well on in-domain benchmarks, they often fail to generalize across various generation conditions, such as unseen prompts and different model families. The research employs a comprehensive benchmark involving multiple prompting strategies and large language models to analyze performance variance through linguistic features.
Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study titled 'Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations' highlights the limitations of current confidence estimation methods for large language models (LLMs), emphasizing the need for evaluations that account for language variations and semantic differences. The research proposes a new framework that assesses confidence quality based on robustness, stability, and sensitivity to variations in prompts and answers.
How Reliable are Confidence Estimators for Large Reasoning Models? A Systematic Benchmark on High-Stakes Domains
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A systematic benchmark has been introduced to evaluate the reliability of confidence estimators for Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) in high-stakes domains, highlighting the miscalibration issues that affect their outputs. The Reasoning Model Confidence estimation Benchmark (RMCB) comprises 347,496 reasoning traces from various LRMs, focusing on clinical, financial, legal, and mathematical reasoning.
BenchOverflow: Measuring Overflow in Large Language Models via Plain-Text Prompts
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study titled 'BenchOverflow' investigates a failure mode in large language models (LLMs) where plain-text prompts lead to excessive outputs, termed Overflow. This phenomenon can increase operational costs, latency, and degrade performance across users, particularly in high-demand environments.
Nationality and Region Prediction from Names: A Comparative Study of Neural Models and Large Language Models
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv compares the effectiveness of neural models and large language models (LLMs) in predicting nationality and region from personal names. The research evaluates six neural models and six LLM prompting strategies across three levels of granularity, revealing that LLMs consistently outperform traditional models in accuracy.
Semantic Gravity Wells: Why Negative Constraints Backfire
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv investigates the phenomenon of negative constraints in large language models, revealing that such instructions often lead to unexpected failures. The research introduces the concept of semantic pressure, which quantitatively measures the likelihood of generating forbidden tokens, and establishes a logistic relationship between violation probability and semantic pressure.
What If TSF: A Benchmark for Reframing Forecasting as Scenario-Guided Multimodal Forecasting
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The introduction of What If TSF (WIT) marks a significant advancement in time series forecasting by establishing a benchmark for scenario-guided multimodal forecasting. This new framework aims to evaluate the ability of models to condition forecasts on contextual text, particularly future scenarios, moving beyond traditional unimodal approaches that rely solely on historical data.
Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQL
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Arctic-Text2SQL-R1 has been introduced as a reinforcement learning framework aimed at improving the accuracy of SQL generation from natural language queries. This model leverages a simple reward signal based on execution correctness, addressing the challenges faced by large language models in producing executable SQL, particularly for complex queries.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about