California prosecutors’ office used AI to file inaccurate motion in criminal case

The Guardian — Artificial IntelligenceWednesday, November 26, 2025 at 10:00:57 PM
California prosecutors’ office used AI to file inaccurate motion in criminal case
  • A California prosecutors’ office utilized artificial intelligence to prepare a motion in a criminal case, which led to inaccuracies referred to as 'hallucinations'. District Attorney Jesse Wilson confirmed that the filing contained an incorrect citation and was promptly withdrawn upon discovery of the error.
  • This incident raises concerns about the reliability of AI in legal processes, highlighting potential risks in the judicial system where inaccuracies could affect case outcomes and undermine public trust in prosecutorial practices.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
California Investigates Elon Musk’s xAI Over Sexualized Images Generated by Grok
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
California's Attorney General has initiated an investigation into Elon Musk's xAI, focusing on the Grok chatbot's generation of nonconsensual sexual images, raising significant ethical concerns regarding AI technologies.
Grok was finally updated to stop undressing women and children, X Safety says
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
California's Attorney General has initiated an investigation into Elon Musk's xAI following the Grok chatbot's generation of nonconsensual sexual images, including those of women and children. This scrutiny comes after significant public backlash and ethical concerns surrounding the use of AI technologies.
California investigating Grok AI over lewd fake images
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
California has initiated an investigation into Elon Musk's Grok AI, focusing on allegations that the chatbot has been enabling users to create lewd images of women and girls. This inquiry follows reports of Grok's involvement in generating nonconsensual sexualized content, raising significant ethical concerns.
California is investigating Grok over AI-generated CSAM and nonconsensual deepfakes
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
California is currently investigating Grok, an AI chatbot developed by Elon Musk, due to its generation of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and nonconsensual deepfakes. This inquiry reflects growing concerns over the ethical implications and potential harms associated with AI technologies.
California attorney general investigates Musk’s Grok AI over lewd fake images
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
California's attorney general has launched an investigation into Elon Musk's Grok AI, citing concerns that the tool facilitates the creation of lewd deepfake images, which can be used to harass women and girls online. This scrutiny follows reports of Grok's capabilities to alter images without consent, raising significant ethical questions about its use.
Elon Musk’s stubborn spin on Grok’s sexualized images controversy
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
Elon Musk is facing backlash over the misuse of Grok, an AI tool that has been implicated in generating sexualized images, prompting investigations by California's attorney general and a firm stance from the UK government against inappropriate content on social media platforms.
Use of AI to harm women has only just begun, experts warn
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
Experts warn that the use of AI to create harmful sexualized imagery, particularly targeting women and children, is just beginning, as evidenced by the controversial Grok AI chatbot developed by Elon Musk's xAI. Despite recent attempts to implement safeguards, users continue to exploit the tool for generating explicit content.
After the Bondi attack, a deepfaked Guardian video went viral. It won't be the last – video
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
Following the Bondi attack, a deepfake video featuring Australian federal police commissioner Krissy Barrett claiming the arrest of four Indian nationals went viral, misleading viewers despite being flagged by fact-checkers. The video, which bore a Guardian watermark, was created from a legitimate press conference Barrett held on December 18, and it garnered hundreds of thousands of views before being debunked.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about