Depth-Wise Activation Steering for Honest Language Models

arXiv — cs.LGTuesday, December 9, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • A new method called Depth-Wise Activation Steering has been introduced to enhance the honesty of large language models (LLMs) like LLaMA, Qwen, and Mistral. This training-free approach utilizes a Gaussian schedule to improve the models' ability to report truthfully, addressing the issue of models asserting falsehoods despite having the correct information internally.
  • This development is significant as it enhances the auditability and safety of LLMs, which are increasingly used in various applications. By improving the honesty of these models, developers can foster greater trust and reliability in AI systems, which is crucial for their adoption in sensitive areas such as healthcare and finance.
  • The introduction of this method aligns with ongoing efforts to improve the safety and reliability of AI technologies. As LLMs face challenges like adversarial prompts and biases in evaluation, advancements like Depth-Wise Activation Steering contribute to a broader discourse on ensuring ethical AI deployment and mitigating risks associated with misinformation.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
Mistral launches powerful Devstral 2 coding model including open source, laptop-friendly version
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
French AI startup Mistral has launched the Devstral 2 coding model, which includes a laptop-friendly version optimized for software engineering tasks. This release follows the introduction of the Mistral 3 LLM family, aimed at enhancing local hardware capabilities for developers.
Know-Show: Benchmarking Video-Language Models on Spatio-Temporal Grounded Reasoning
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A new benchmark called Know-Show has been introduced to evaluate the spatio-temporal grounded reasoning capabilities of large Video-Language Models (Video-LMs). This benchmark consists of five scenarios that assess how well these models can reason about actions while grounding their inferences in visual and temporal evidence, highlighting significant gaps between current models and human reasoning.
Large Language Model-Based Generation of Discharge Summaries
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Recent research has demonstrated the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automating the generation of discharge summaries, which are critical documents in patient care. The study evaluated five models, including proprietary systems like GPT-4 and Gemini 1.5 Pro, and found that Gemini, particularly with one-shot prompting, produced summaries most similar to gold standards. This advancement could significantly reduce the workload of healthcare professionals and enhance the accuracy of patient information.
Leveraging KV Similarity for Online Structured Pruning in LLMs
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
A new online structured pruning technique called Token Filtering has been introduced for large language models (LLMs), allowing pruning decisions to be made during inference without the need for calibration data. This method measures token redundancy through joint key-value similarity, effectively reducing inference costs while maintaining essential information. The approach also includes a variance-aware fusion strategy to ensure important tokens are preserved even with high pruning ratios.
GSAE: Graph-Regularized Sparse Autoencoders for Robust LLM Safety Steering
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The introduction of Graph-Regularized Sparse Autoencoders (GSAEs) aims to enhance the safety of large language models (LLMs) by addressing their vulnerabilities to adversarial prompts and jailbreak attacks. GSAEs extend traditional sparse autoencoders by incorporating a Laplacian smoothness penalty, allowing for the recovery of distributed safety representations across multiple features rather than isolating them in a single latent dimension.
LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Retrieval Augmented Generation
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
Recent research indicates that large language models (LLMs) demonstrate biases in evaluation tasks, particularly favoring self-generated content. However, a study exploring retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks found no significant self-preference effect, suggesting that LLMs can evaluate factual content more impartially than previously thought.
From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized automated software development, enabling the conversion of natural language into functional code, as highlighted in a comprehensive survey on code intelligence. This evolution is exemplified by tools like Github Copilot and Claude Code, which have significantly improved coding success rates on benchmarks like HumanEval.
Less Is More for Multi-Step Logical Reasoning of LLM Generalisation Under Rule Removal, Paraphrasing, and Compression
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
Recent research has introduced a controlled evaluation framework to assess the generalization capabilities of large language models (LLMs) like BERT, Qwen2, and LLaMA under various logical perturbations, including rule deletion and contradictory evidence. The findings indicate that these models maintain high accuracy despite structural changes in reasoning tasks.