Frustrated authors withdraw papers after realizing their reviewers are just lazy LLMs
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
- Researchers are withdrawing their papers from an upcoming AI conference after discovering that their reviewers are relying on AI-generated critiques rather than conducting thorough evaluations. This revelation highlights significant issues within the scientific review process, as authors express frustration over the lack of genuine engagement from reviewers.
- The reliance on AI for paper reviews raises concerns about the integrity and quality of academic publishing. Authors from elite universities are particularly disillusioned, fearing that their work may not receive the critical analysis it deserves, potentially undermining the credibility of the conference.
- This situation reflects a broader trend of dissatisfaction with AI's role in various sectors, including education and legal proceedings, where similar concerns about authenticity and accountability have emerged. The growing reliance on AI systems has sparked debates about their effectiveness and the potential for misuse, contributing to a phenomenon known as AI fatigue among professionals.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System
