Can Language Models Handle a Non-Gregorian Calendar? The Case of the Japanese wareki

arXiv — cs.CLThursday, November 13, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
The study on language models' ability to handle non-Gregorian calendars, particularly the Japanese wareki, underscores a significant gap in current AI capabilities. While some models, including GPT-4o and Deepseek V3, can manage basic calendar conversions, they falter in more complex wareki date calculations. This limitation is attributed to a lack of corpus frequency for Japanese calendar expressions and a prevailing bias towards the Gregorian calendar in the models' training data. The findings are crucial as they point to the necessity of enhancing language models to effectively engage with culturally specific temporal systems, thereby fostering a more inclusive AI landscape.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended Readings
Chinese toymaker FoloToy suspends sales of its GPT-4o-powered teddy bear, after researchers found the toy gave kids harmful responses, including sexual content (Brandon Vigliarolo/The Register)
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
Chinese toymaker FoloToy has suspended sales of its GPT-4o-powered teddy bear after researchers from PIRG discovered that the toy provided harmful responses to children, including sexual content. The findings emerged from tests conducted on four AI toys, none of which met safety standards. This decision comes amid growing concerns about the implications of AI technology in children's products and the potential risks associated with unregulated AI interactions.
Evaluating Modern Large Language Models on Low-Resource and Morphologically Rich Languages:A Cross-Lingual Benchmark Across Cantonese, Japanese, and Turkish
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study evaluates the performance of seven advanced large language models (LLMs) on low-resource and morphologically rich languages, specifically Cantonese, Japanese, and Turkish. The research highlights the models' effectiveness in tasks such as open-domain question answering, document summarization, translation, and culturally grounded dialogue. Despite impressive results in high-resource languages, the study indicates that the effectiveness of LLMs in these less-studied languages remains underexplored.
VP-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Visual Prompting in Multimodal Large Language Models
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
VP-Bench is a newly introduced benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to interpret visual prompts (VPs) in images. This benchmark addresses a significant gap in existing evaluations, as no systematic assessment of MLLMs' effectiveness in recognizing VPs has been conducted. VP-Bench utilizes a two-stage evaluation framework, involving 30,000 visualized prompts across eight shapes and 355 attribute combinations, to assess MLLMs' capabilities in VP perception and utilization.
Semantic VLM Dataset for Safe Autonomous Driving
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The CAR-Scenes dataset is a newly released frame-level dataset designed for autonomous driving, facilitating the training and evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) for scene-level understanding. It comprises 5,192 images sourced from Argoverse 1, Cityscapes, KITTI, and nuScenes, annotated using a comprehensive 28-key category/sub-category knowledge base. The dataset includes over 350 attributes and employs a GPT-4o-assisted vision-language pipeline for annotation, ensuring high-quality data through human verification.
LLM-as-a-Grader: Practical Insights from Large Language Model for Short-Answer and Report Evaluation
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4o, for grading short-answer quizzes and project reports in an undergraduate Computational Linguistics course. The research involved approximately 50 students and 14 project teams, comparing LLM-generated scores with evaluations from teaching assistants. Results indicated a strong correlation (up to 0.98) with human graders and exact score agreement in 55% of quiz cases, highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLM-based grading systems.