Critical or Compliant? The Double-Edged Sword of Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought Explanations

arXiv — cs.CLThursday, November 20, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • The study investigates the dual nature of Chain
  • Understanding this duality is crucial for developers of NLP systems, as it highlights the need for explanations that promote critical scrutiny rather than blind trust in outputs.
  • The findings resonate with ongoing discussions about the reliability of AI systems, emphasizing the importance of refining explanation methods to balance user trust with the need for accurate reasoning, especially as VLMs become increasingly integrated into various applications.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
Debiasing Large Language Models via Adaptive Causal Prompting with Sketch-of-Thought
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Recent advancements in prompting methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to the introduction of the Adaptive Causal Prompting with Sketch-of-Thought (ACPS) framework, which aims to enhance reasoning capabilities while reducing token usage and inference costs. This framework utilizes structural causal models to adaptively select interventions for improved generalizability across diverse reasoning tasks.
Cultural Compass: A Framework for Organizing Societal Norms to Detect Violations in Human-AI Conversations
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A new framework titled 'Cultural Compass' has been introduced to enhance the understanding of how generative AI models adhere to sociocultural norms during human-AI interactions. This framework categorizes norms into distinct types, clarifying their contexts and mechanisms for enforcement, aiming to improve the evaluation of AI models in diverse cultural settings.
ORBIT: On-policy Exploration-Exploitation for Controllable Multi-Budget Reasoning
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The recent introduction of ORBIT, a controllable multi-budget reasoning framework, aims to enhance the efficiency of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) by optimizing the reasoning process based on input. This framework utilizes multi-stage reinforcement learning to identify optimal reasoning behaviors, addressing the computational inefficiencies associated with traditional Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning methods.
STAR: Detecting Inference-time Backdoors in LLM Reasoning via State-Transition Amplification Ratio
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The recent introduction of STAR (State-Transition Amplification Ratio) provides a framework for detecting inference-time backdoors in large language models (LLMs) that exploit reasoning mechanisms like Chain-of-Thought (CoT). This framework identifies malicious reasoning paths by analyzing output probability shifts, addressing a significant vulnerability in LLMs that conventional detection methods fail to capture.
Multiplex Thinking: Reasoning via Token-wise Branch-and-Merge
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The recent introduction of Multiplex Thinking presents a novel stochastic soft reasoning mechanism that enhances the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by sampling multiple candidate tokens at each step and aggregating their embeddings into a single multiplex token. This method contrasts with traditional Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approaches, which often rely on lengthy token sequences.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about