GRAFT: GRaPH and Table Reasoning for Textual Alignment -- A Benchmark for Structured Instruction Following and Visual Reasoning

arXiv — cs.LGWednesday, December 3, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • GRAFT has been introduced as a structured multimodal benchmark aimed at evaluating how well large language models (LLMs) can follow instructions, reason visually, and align text with visual data. The dataset includes programmatically generated charts and tables, each linked to multi-step analytical questions that require inference from the images alone. Responses are structured in formats like JSON or YAML for precise evaluation of reasoning and output adherence.
  • This development is significant as it provides a unified framework for assessing LLM capabilities in multimodal contexts, addressing the increasing demand for models that can integrate and process visual and textual information effectively. By establishing clear benchmarks, GRAFT aims to enhance the reliability and performance of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks.
  • The introduction of GRAFT reflects a broader trend in AI research focusing on improving reasoning capabilities across various modalities. This aligns with ongoing efforts to enhance LLMs' performance in tasks such as spatial reasoning and abstract thinking, as seen in recent advancements like SpatialGeo and AbstRaL. These developments highlight the importance of refining LLMs to handle diverse and intricate reasoning challenges, ultimately pushing the boundaries of AI applications.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
From Lab to Reality: A Practical Evaluation of Deep Learning Models and LLMs for Vulnerability Detection
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study evaluated the effectiveness of deep learning models and large language models (LLMs) for vulnerability detection, focusing on models like ReVeal and LineVul across four datasets: Juliet, Devign, BigVul, and ICVul. The research highlights the gap between benchmark performance and real-world applicability, emphasizing the need for systematic evaluation in practical scenarios.
On the Design of KL-Regularized Policy Gradient Algorithms for LLM Reasoning
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Recent advancements in KL-Regularized Policy Gradient algorithms have been proposed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The study introduces a unified derivation known as the Regularized Policy Gradient (RPG) view, which clarifies the necessary weighting for KL variants in off-policy settings, aiming to optimize the surrogate for the intended KL-regularized objective.
Unforgotten Safety: Preserving Safety Alignment of Large Language Models with Continual Learning
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
A recent study highlights the importance of safety alignment in large language models (LLMs) as they are increasingly adapted for various tasks. The research identifies safety degradation during fine-tuning, attributing it to catastrophic forgetting, and proposes continual learning (CL) strategies to preserve safety. The evaluation of these strategies shows that they can effectively reduce attack success rates compared to standard fine-tuning methods.
Textual Data Bias Detection and Mitigation - An Extensible Pipeline with Experimental Evaluation
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A new study has introduced a comprehensive pipeline for detecting and mitigating biases in textual data used to train large language models (LLMs), addressing representation bias and stereotypes as mandated by regulations like the European AI Act. The proposed pipeline includes generating word lists, quantifying representation bias, and employing sociolinguistic filtering to mitigate stereotypes.
Anthropocentric bias in language model evaluation
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study highlights the need to address anthropocentric biases in evaluating large language models (LLMs), identifying two overlooked types: auxiliary oversight and mechanistic chauvinism. These biases can hinder the accurate assessment of LLM cognitive capacities, necessitating a more nuanced evaluation approach.
Cooperative Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question Answering: Mutual Information Exchange and Ranking by Contrasting Layers
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
A novel framework named CoopRAG has been introduced to enhance question answering by enabling cooperative interactions between a retriever and a large language model (LLM). This approach aims to mitigate issues of factual inaccuracies and hallucinations that are common in existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods. By unrolling questions into sub-questions and utilizing a reasoning chain, CoopRAG seeks to improve the accuracy of document retrieval relevant to user queries.
Can LLMs Detect Their Confabulations? Estimating Reliability in Uncertainty-Aware Language Models
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study investigates the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting their own confabulations, which are fluent but incorrect outputs. The research focuses on how in-context information affects model behavior and whether LLMs can recognize unreliable responses. By estimating token-level uncertainty, the study aims to enhance response-level reliability predictions through controlled experiments on open QA benchmarks.
GFM-RAG: Graph Foundation Model for Retrieval Augmented Generation
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
GFM-RAG, a novel graph foundation model for retrieval augmented generation, has been introduced to enhance the integration of knowledge into large language models (LLMs). This model utilizes an innovative graph neural network to effectively capture complex relationships between queries and knowledge, addressing limitations faced by conventional retrieval-augmented generation systems.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about