Categorical Emotions or Appraisals - Which Emotion Model Explains Argument Convincingness Better?
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
- The study investigates how the convincingness of arguments is affected by emotional responses, suggesting that these responses are subjective and depend on individual factors. The authors propose that appraisal theories may provide a framework for understanding this relationship, which has not been extensively studied in the context of argument analysis.
- This research is significant as it could enhance the understanding of effective communication strategies in various fields, including artificial intelligence and persuasive discourse. By linking cognitive evaluations to emotional responses, it may offer new insights into how arguments can be crafted to resonate more effectively with different audiences.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System
