LLM Output Drift: Cross-Provider Validation & Mitigation for Financial Workflows

arXiv — stat.MLWednesday, November 12, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
The study on LLM output drift, published on arXiv, examined five models across regulated financial tasks, revealing that smaller models, specifically Granite-3-8B and Qwen2.5-7B, maintained 100% output consistency, while the larger GPT-OSS-120B showed only 12.5%. This stark contrast raises concerns about the reliability of larger models in critical financial applications, where nondeterministic outputs can compromise auditability and trust. The findings challenge the prevailing belief that larger models are inherently superior, emphasizing the importance of a nuanced approach to model selection. The research introduces a finance-calibrated deterministic test harness and a three-tier model classification system to guide risk-appropriate deployment decisions, ensuring that financial institutions can maintain compliance and trust in their AI systems.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended Readings
InData: Towards Secure Multi-Step, Tool-Based Data Analysis
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The article discusses the introduction of InData, a dataset aimed at enhancing the security of large language model (LLM) agents used for data analysis. Traditional methods allow LLMs to generate and execute code directly on databases, which poses security risks, especially with sensitive data. InData proposes a solution by restricting LLMs from direct code generation and requiring them to use a predefined set of secure tools. The dataset includes questions of varying difficulty to assess multi-step reasoning capabilities of LLMs.