Assessing LLM Reasoning Steps via Principal Knowledge Grounding

arXiv — cs.LG•Tuesday, November 4, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM

A new evaluation suite has been introduced to assess how well large language models (LLMs) ground their reasoning in knowledge. This innovative framework aims to ensure that the step-by-step reasoning employed by these models is both accurate and reliable. By focusing on the grounding of reasoning, the suite addresses a crucial aspect of LLM effectiveness, particularly in handling complex tasks. The primary goal of this framework is to provide a systematic method for evaluating the knowledge-based reasoning steps that LLMs use. This development represents an important step toward improving the transparency and trustworthiness of AI systems. As large language models continue to be integrated into various applications, such evaluation tools become essential for verifying their performance. The introduction of this suite marks progress in the ongoing effort to refine AI reasoning capabilities.

— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Read Original

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Continue Readings

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

Explaining Generalization of AI-Generated Text Detectors Through Linguistic Analysis

NeutralArtificial Intelligence

A recent study published on arXiv investigates the generalization capabilities of AI-generated text detectors, revealing that while these detectors perform well on in-domain benchmarks, they often fail to generalize across various generation conditions, such as unseen prompts and different model families. The research employs a comprehensive benchmark involving multiple prompting strategies and large language models to analyze performance variance through linguistic features.

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations

NeutralArtificial Intelligence

A recent study titled 'Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations' highlights the limitations of current confidence estimation methods for large language models (LLMs), emphasizing the need for evaluations that account for language variations and semantic differences. The research proposes a new framework that assesses confidence quality based on robustness, stability, and sensitivity to variations in prompts and answers.

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

BenchOverflow: Measuring Overflow in Large Language Models via Plain-Text Prompts

NeutralArtificial Intelligence

A recent study titled 'BenchOverflow' investigates a failure mode in large language models (LLMs) where plain-text prompts lead to excessive outputs, termed Overflow. This phenomenon can increase operational costs, latency, and degrade performance across users, particularly in high-demand environments.

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

Nationality and Region Prediction from Names: A Comparative Study of Neural Models and Large Language Models

NeutralArtificial Intelligence

A recent study published on arXiv compares the effectiveness of neural models and large language models (LLMs) in predicting nationality and region from personal names. The research evaluates six neural models and six LLM prompting strategies across three levels of granularity, revealing that LLMs consistently outperform traditional models in accuracy.

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

Semantic Gravity Wells: Why Negative Constraints Backfire

NeutralArtificial Intelligence

A recent study published on arXiv investigates the phenomenon of negative constraints in large language models, revealing that such instructions often lead to unexpected failures. The research introduces the concept of semantic pressure, which quantitatively measures the likelihood of generating forbidden tokens, and establishes a logistic relationship between violation probability and semantic pressure.

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

What If TSF: A Benchmark for Reframing Forecasting as Scenario-Guided Multimodal Forecasting

NeutralArtificial Intelligence

The introduction of What If TSF (WIT) marks a significant advancement in time series forecasting by establishing a benchmark for scenario-guided multimodal forecasting. This new framework aims to evaluate the ability of models to condition forecasts on contextual text, particularly future scenarios, moving beyond traditional unimodal approaches that rely solely on historical data.

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQL

PositiveArtificial Intelligence

Arctic-Text2SQL-R1 has been introduced as a reinforcement learning framework aimed at improving the accuracy of SQL generation from natural language queries. This model leverages a simple reward signal based on execution correctness, addressing the challenges faced by large language models in producing executable SQL, particularly for complex queries.

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

arXiv — cs.CL2 days ago

Alleviating Attention Hacking in Discriminative Reward Modeling through Interaction Distillation

NeutralArtificial Intelligence

A new study proposes a framework called Interaction Distillation to enhance discriminative reward modeling in large language models (LLMs), addressing vulnerabilities in token-level interaction that can lead to attention hacking. This framework aims to improve the reliability of reward signals generated during reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF).

Read full article

via arXiv — cs.CL

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about