More than half of researchers now use AI for peer review — often against guidance
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
- More than half of researchers are now utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) for peer review processes, often in ways that contradict established guidelines. This trend reflects a significant shift in how academic evaluations are conducted, indicating a growing reliance on AI technologies in research methodologies.
- The increasing use of AI in peer review raises important questions about the integrity and quality of academic publishing. As researchers adopt these tools, concerns about adherence to ethical standards and the potential for bias in AI algorithms become more pronounced, necessitating a reevaluation of current practices.
- This development is part of a broader trend where AI is enhancing efficiency in various fields, including software development and biological research. However, it also highlights the dual-edged nature of AI, where increased productivity may come at the cost of quality and ethical considerations, prompting ongoing debates about the implications of AI integration in critical decision-making processes.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System
