<A HREF="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-14/microsoft-disavows-religion-bias-in-discount-program-for-nonprofits"><IMG VSPACE="4" HSPACE="4" BORDER="0" ALIGN="RIGHT" SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/251114/i23.jpg"></A>
<A HREF="http://www.techmeme.com/251114/p23#a251114p23" TITLE="Techmeme permalink"><IMG WIDTH=11 HEIGHT=12 SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/img/pml.png" STYLE="border:none;padding:0;margin:0;"></A> Jeff Green / <A HREF="https://www.bloomberg.com/">Bloomberg</A>: 
<A HREF="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-14/microsoft-disavows-religion-bias-in-discount-program-for-nonprofits">Microsoft signs a deal with a legal advocacy group to resolve claims it denied discounts to conservative religious nonprofits; OpenAI and Asana also made deals</A>&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Microsoft Corp. signed an agreement to put to rest accusations that it used a litmus test to deny software discounts to conservative faith-based groups.

وقعت شركة مايكروسوفت اتفاقًا لإنهاء الاتهامات التي تفيد بأنها رفضت تقديم خصومات على البرمجيات للمنظمات الدينية المحافظة بناءً على اختبار محدد. يهدف هذا الاتفاق إلى حل الادعاءات المتعلقة بالتمييز ضد هذه المنظمات. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، أبرمت كل من OpenAI وAsana اتفاقات أيضًا، على الرغم من عدم تحديد تفاصيل هذه الاتفاقات في التقرير.

Microsoft Corp. firmó un acuerdo para resolver las acusaciones de que negó descuentos en software a organizaciones religiosas conservadoras basándose en un test de pureza. Este acuerdo tiene como objetivo resolver las reclamaciones de discriminación contra estas organizaciones. Además, OpenAI y Asana también han realizado acuerdos, aunque no se especifican los detalles de estos en el informe.

Microsoft Corp. a signé un accord pour mettre fin aux allégations selon lesquelles elle aurait refusé des réductions de logiciels à des organisations religieuses conservatrices sur la base d'un test de pureté. Cet accord vise à résoudre des accusations de discrimination à l'encontre de ces organisations. De plus, OpenAI et Asana ont également conclu des accords, bien que les détails de ces accords ne soient pas précisés dans le rapport.

Microsoft Corp. has signed an agreement to settle allegations that it denied software discounts to conservative religious nonprofits based on a litmus test. This deal aims to resolve claims of discrimination against these organizations. Additionally, OpenAI and Asana have also entered into agreements, although details of these deals are not specified in the report.

Microsoft signs a deal with a legal advocacy group to resolve claims it denied discounts to conservative religious nonprofits; OpenAI and Asana also made deals (Jeff Green/Bloomberg)

<A HREF="https://fortune.com/2025/11/19/exclusive-doppel-raises-70-million-series-c-at-more-than-600-million-valuation-to-fight-ai-powered-social-engineering-attacks/"><IMG VSPACE="4" HSPACE="4" BORDER="0" ALIGN="RIGHT" SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/251119/i39.jpg"></A>
<A HREF="http://www.techmeme.com/251119/p39#a251119p39" TITLE="Techmeme permalink"><IMG WIDTH=11 HEIGHT=12 SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/img/pml.png" STYLE="border:none;padding:0;margin:0;"></A> Allie Garfinkle / <A HREF="http://www.fortune.com/">Fortune</A>: 
<A HREF="https://fortune.com/2025/11/19/exclusive-doppel-raises-70-million-series-c-at-more-than-600-million-valuation-to-fight-ai-powered-social-engineering-attacks/">Doppel, which makes an AI social engineering detection service, raised a $70M Series C led by Bessemer at a $600M+ valuation, up from $205M in May</A>&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Senior Finance Reporter And Author Of Term Sheet&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; I tried to fool my brother, sort of.&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Next to him and his Pekingese on the couch &hellip;

دوبل، وهي شركة متخصصة في خدمات الكشف عن الهندسة الاجتماعية باستخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي، نجحت في جمع 70 مليون دولار في جولة تمويل من السلسلة C بقيادة بيسمر. وقد زادت هذه الجولة من تقييم الشركة إلى أكثر من 600 مليون دولار، ارتفاعًا من 205 مليون دولار في مايو.

Doppel, una empresa que se especializa en servicios de detección de ingeniería social mediante IA, ha recaudado con éxito 70 millones de dólares en una ronda de financiación Serie C liderada por Bessemer. Esta ronda ha elevado la valoración de la empresa a más de 600 millones de dólares, un aumento significativo desde los 205 millones en mayo.

Doppel, une entreprise spécialisée dans les services de détection d'ingénierie sociale par IA, a levé avec succès 70 millions de dollars lors d'un tour de financement de série C dirigé par Bessemer. Ce tour de financement a porté la valorisation de l'entreprise à plus de 600 millions de dollars, contre 205 millions en mai.

Doppel, a company specializing in AI social engineering detection services, has successfully raised $70 million in a Series C funding round led by Bessemer. This funding round has increased the company's valuation to over $600 million, a significant rise from $205 million in May.

Doppel, which makes an AI social engineering detection service, raised a $70M Series C led by Bessemer at a $600M+ valuation, up from $205M in May (Allie Garfinkle/Fortune)

The service is customized for teachers' needs and includes added security and privacy, a collaborative workspace, and more.

OpenAI expands free educational offerings - here's what ChatGPT for Teachers can do

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is ready to take on your next massive coding job. Here's what's new.

OpenAI's Codex Max solves one of my biggest AI coding annoyances - and adds dramatically faster performance

The agent offers one-click buying for all your holiday needs and will be free for all US-based users.

Perplexity's AI shopping tool is free for all now, just in time for Black Friday - how to use it

<a href="https://fetch.ai/">Fetch AI</a>, a startup founded and led by former DeepMind founding investor, Humayun Sheikh, <a href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251119088395/en/Fetch-Combines-Personalized-AI-with-Multi-Agent-Collaboration-to-Handle-Complex-Consumer-Tasks-Launches-Claim-Your-Agent-to-Fight-Brand-Knock-Offs">today announced the release</a> of three interconnected products designed to provide the trust, coordination, and interoperability needed for large-scale AI agent ecosystems. The launch includes <a href="https://asi1.ai/">ASI:One</a>, a personal-AI orchestration platform; <a href="https://business.fetch.ai/">Fetch Business</a>, a verification and discovery portal for brand agents; and <a href="https://agentverse.ai/?sort=relevancy&amp;page=1&amp;recommended=true">Agentverse</a>, an open directory hosting more than two million agents. Together, the system positions Fetch as an infrastructure provider for what it calls the “Agentic Web”—a layer where consumer AIs and brand AIs collaborate to complete tasks instead of merely suggesting them.The company says the tools address a central limitation in current consumer AI: models can provide recommendations but cannot reliably execute multi-step actions that require coordination across businesses. Fetch’s approach centers on enabling agents from different organizations to interoperate securely, using verified identities and shared context to complete end-to-end workflows.“We’re creating the same foundation for agents that Google created for websites,” said Humayun Sheikh, Founder and CEO of Fetch AI, and an early investor in DeepMind, in a press release provided to VentureBeat. “Instead of just finding information, your personal AI coordinates with verified brand agents to get things done.”<h2>Background: Fetch’s Founding and DeepMind Connection </h2>Fetch AI was founded in 2017 by Humayun Sheikh, an entrepreneur whose early investment in DeepMind helped support the company’s commercial development before its acquisition by Google. “I was one of the first five people at DeepMind and its first investor. My check was the first one in,” Sheikh said, reflecting on the period when advanced machine learning research was still largely inaccessible outside major technology companies.His early experience helped shape Fetch’s direction. “Even in 2013, it was clear to me that agentic systems were going to be the ones that worked. That’s where I focused—on the agentic web,” Sheikh noted. Fetch built on this thesis by developing infrastructure for autonomous software agents, focusing on verifiable identity, secure data exchange, and multi-agent coordination. Over the past several years, the company has expanded to a 70-person team across Cambridge and Menlo Park, raised approximately $60 million, and accumulated more than one million users interacting with its model—data that informed the design of the newly launched products.Sheikh added that his decision to bootstrap the company initially came directly from the proceeds of the DeepMind exit, noting in the interview that while the sale to Google was “a good exit,” he believed the team could have held out for a higher valuation. The early self-funding period allowed Fetch to begin work in 2015—well before transformer architectures went mainstream—on the hypothesis that agentic infrastructure would become foundational to applied AI.<h2>ASI:One — A Platform for Multi-Agent Orchestration</h2>At the core of the launch is ASI:One, a language model interface designed specifically for coordinating multiple agents rather than addressing isolated queries. Fetch describes it as an “intelligence layer” that handles context sharing, task routing, and preference modeling.The system stores user-level signals such as favored airlines, dietary constraints, budget ranges, loyalty program identifiers, and calendar availability. When a user requests a complex task—such as planning a trip with flights, hotels, and restaurant reservations—ASI:One retrieves those preferences and delegates work to the appropriate verified agents. The agents then return actionable outputs, including inventory and booking options, rather than generic recommendations.In practice, ASI:One functions as a workflow generator across organizational boundaries. By contrast with conventional LLM applications, which often rely on APIs or RAG techniques to surface information, ASI:One is built to coordinate autonomous agents that can complete transactions. Fetch notes that personalization improves over time as the model accumulates structured preference data.Sheikh emphasized the distinction between orchestrated execution and traditional AI output. “This isn’t searching for options separately and hoping they work together,” he said. “It’s orchestration.” He added that Fetch’s architecture is intentionally modular: “Our architecture is a mix of agentic and expert models. One large model isn’t enough—you need specialists. That’s why we built ASI1, tuned specifically for agentic systems.”The interview also revealed new details about ASI:One’s personalization systems: the platform uses multiple user-owned knowledge graphs to store preferences, travel history, social connections, and contextual constraints. These knowledge graphs are siloed per user and not co-mingled with any Fetch-operated data. Sheikh described this as a “deterministic backbone” that gives the personal AI a stable memory layer beyond the probabilistic output of a single large model.ASI:One launches in Beta today, with a broader release planned for early 2026. Fetch also offers ASI:One Mobile, released earlier this year, giving users access to the same agent-orchestration capabilities on iOS and Android. The mobile app connects directly to Agentverse and the user’s knowledge graphs, enabling on-the-go task execution and real-time interaction with registered agents.<h2>Fetch Business — Verified Identity and Brand Control</h2>To enable reliable coordination between consumers and companies, Fetch is introducing a verification and discovery portal called Fetch Business. The platform allows organizations to verify their identity and claim an official Brand Agent handle—for example, @Hilton or @Nike—regardless of which tools they use to build the underlying agent.Fetch positions the product as an analogue to ICANN domain registration and SSL certificate systems for websites. Verified status is intended to protect consumers from interacting with counterfeit or untrusted agents, a problem the company describes as a major barrier to widespread agent adoption.The system includes low-code tools for small businesses to create agents in a few steps and connect real-time APIs such as inventory, booking systems, or CRM platforms. “With Fetch, you can create an agent in one minute. It gets a handle, like a Twitter username, and you can personalize it completely—even give it your social media permissions to post on your behalf,” Sheikh said. Once a brand claims its namespace, its agent becomes discoverable to consumer AIs and other agents inside Agentverse.The company has pre-reserved thousands of brand namespaces in anticipation of demand. Verification status persists across any platform that integrates with Agentverse, creating a portable identity layer for business agents.The interview highlighted that Fetch Business inherits web-trust primitives directly: domain owners verify their identity by inserting a short code snippet into their existing website backend, allowing the system to pass a cryptographic challenge and grant the agent an authenticity badge similar to a “blue check” for agent identities. Sheikh framed this as “reusing the trust layer the web already spent decades building.”Companies can begin claiming agents now at <a href="https://business.fetch.ai/">business.fetch.ai</a>.<h2>Agentverse — An Open Directory of More Than Two Million Agents</h2>The final component of the release is <a href="https://agentverse.ai/">Agentverse</a>, an open directory and cloud platform that hosts agents and enables cross-ecosystem discoverability. Fetch states that millions of agents have already registered, spanning travel, retail, entertainment, food service, and enterprise categories.Agentverse provides metadata, capability descriptions, and routing logic that ASI:One uses to identify appropriate agents for specific tasks. It also supports secure communication and data exchange between agents. The company notes that the directory is platform-agnostic: agents built with any framework can join and interoperate.According to Sheikh, the lack of a discovery layer is one reason most AI agents see little or no usage. “Ninety percent of AI agents never get used because there’s no discovery layer,” he said. He framed the role of Agentverse in more technical terms: “Right now, if you build an agent, there’s no universal way for others to discover it. That’s what AgentVerse solves—it’s like DNS for agents.” He also described the system as an essential component of the emerging agent economy: “Fetch is building the Google of agents. Just like websites needed search, agents need discovery, trust, and interaction—Fetch provides all of that.”The interview further underscored that Agentverse is cloud-agnostic by design. Sheikh contrasted this with competing agent ecosystems tied to specific cloud providers, arguing that a universal registry is only viable if independent of proprietary cloud environments. He said the open architecture enables an LLM to query any agent “within one minute of deployment,” turning agent publication into a near-instantaneous process similar to registering a domain.Agentverse also integrates payment pathways, enabling agents to execute purchases using partners such as Visa, Skyfire, and supported stablecoins. Consumers can configure spending limits or require explicit approval for transactions.<h2>Industry Context and Implications</h2>Fetch’s launch comes at a time when consumer AI platforms are exploring the shift from static chat interfaces toward autonomous agents capable of completing actions. However, most agent systems remain limited by siloed architectures, limited interoperability, and weak verification standards.Fetch positions its infrastructure as a response to these limitations by providing a cross-platform coordination layer, identity system, and directory service. The company argues that an agent ecosystem requires consistent verification mechanisms to ensure that consumers interact with authentic brand representatives rather than imitations. By establishing namespace control and portable trust indicators, Fetch Business aims to fill a gap similar to early web domain verification.At the same time, ASI:One attempts to centralize user preference data in a way that enables more efficient personalization and multi-agent coordination. This approach differs from generalist LLM applications, which often lack persistent preference architectures or direct access to brand-controlled agents.The interview also made clear that micropayments and digital transaction infrastructure are central to Fetch’s long-term vision. Sheikh referenced integrations with protocols such as Coinbase’s 402 and AP2, positioning these capabilities as essential for autonomous agents to complete end-to-end tasks that include financial execution.<h2>Takeaway</h2>Fetch’s combined release of ASI:One, Fetch Business, and Agentverse introduces an interconnected stack designed to support large-scale deployment and usage of AI agents. The company frames the system as foundational infrastructure for an agentic ecosystem, where consumer AIs can coordinate with verified brand agents to complete tasks reliably and securely. The additions to its identity, discovery, and orchestration layers reflect Fetch’s long-standing thesis—rooted partly in lessons from DeepMind’s early development—that intelligence becomes meaningful only when paired with the capacity to act.

أطلقت شركة Fetch AI، وهي شركة ناشئة يقودها هميون شيخ، ثلاثة منتجات مترابطة تهدف إلى تعزيز نظام وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي. تشمل العروض الجديدة ASI:One، وهي منصة تنسيق ذكاء اصطناعي شخصي، وFetch Business، وهو بوابة للتحقق والاكتشاف لوكلاء العلامات التجارية، وAgentverse، وهو دليل مفتوح يضم أكثر من مليوني وكيل. تسعى هذه المبادرة إلى إنشاء بنية تحتية قوية لما تصفه Fetch بـ 'الويب الوكالي.'

Fetch AI, una startup dirigida por Humayun Sheikh, ha lanzado tres productos interconectados destinados a mejorar el ecosistema de agentes de IA. Las nuevas ofertas incluyen ASI:One, una plataforma de orquestación de IA personal, Fetch Business, un portal de verificación y descubrimiento para agentes de marca, y Agentverse, un directorio abierto con más de dos millones de agentes. Esta iniciativa busca establecer una infraestructura sólida para lo que Fetch describe como la 'Web Agente.'

Fetch AI, une startup dirigée par Humayun Sheikh, a lancé trois produits interconnectés visant à améliorer l'écosystème des agents IA. Les nouvelles offres comprennent ASI:One, une plateforme d'orchestration d'IA personnelle, Fetch Business, un portail de vérification et de découverte pour les agents de marque, et Agentverse, un annuaire ouvert avec plus de deux millions d'agents. Cette initiative vise à établir une infrastructure robuste pour ce que Fetch décrit comme le 'Web Agentique.'

Fetch AI, a startup led by Humayun Sheikh, has launched three interconnected products aimed at enhancing the ecosystem of AI agents. The new offerings include ASI:One, a personal-AI orchestration platform, Fetch Business, a verification and discovery portal for brand agents, and Agentverse, an open directory with over two million agents. This initiative seeks to establish a robust infrastructure for what Fetch describes as the 'Agentic Web.'

The Google Search of AI agents? Fetch launches ASI:One and Business tier for new era of non-human web

If aesthetics and efficiency top your list of needs, there are several Linux distributions that are right up your alley. Both Ubuntu Budgie and Pop!_OS should top that list.

Ubuntu Budgie vs. Pop!_OS: I've used both Linux distros - here's how to choose

Two weeks ago I read a line about tool use with Claude that stuck in my head. Paraphrased:

<blockquote>
Direct tool calls don’t really scale. 
Have the model write code that uses tools, and execute that code instead.
</blockquote>

At the same time, I was knee-deep in wiring a JavaScript execution environment into Contenox, my self-hosted runtime for deterministic, chat-native AI workflows.

So of course the thought was:

<blockquote>
What if I just let the model write the JavaScript and run it inside the runtime? 😅
</blockquote>

This post is about what happened when I tried exactly that.




<h2>
 
 
 What is Contenox?
</h2>

Very short version:

<blockquote>
Contenox is a self-hostable runtime for sovereign GenAI applications. 
It models AI behavior as explicit state machines, not opaque prompt chains.
</blockquote>

Some key properties:

Runtime, not a library, Explicit state machines, Chat-native interface, Vendor-agnostic &amp; self-hosted, written in go with lots of passion and zero tolerance for shortcuts




<h2>
 
 
 The experiment: ask it to fetch and summarize a TODO
</h2>

Once the JS execution hook was in place (a Goja VM with some globals exposed), I wired up a new state machine: 


<div class="highlight js-code-highlight">
<pre class="highlight plaintext"><code>mux_input → moderate → generate_js → run_js → eval_js_result → (repair_js?) → answer
</code></pre>

</div>



Then I opened the Contenox chat UI and typed:

<blockquote>
Me: “Hey Contenox, fetch the TODO item from jsonplaceholder and summarize it.”
</blockquote>

The first attempt didn’t go as planned.

Instead of a neat summary, I got:

<blockquote>
Contenox: 
“I'm sorry, but it seems there was a problem fetching the TODO item from the provided URL due to an Internal Server Error (status code: 500). Unfortunately, I couldn't retrieve any data at this time. My apologies for the inconvenience!”
</blockquote>

I checked manually – Cloudflare was having a moment, JSONPlaceholder was behind it, and the request really was failing. Okay, fair. Long coffee break.

A bit later, I went back to the same chat and typed:

<blockquote>
Me: “okay let's try again now.”
</blockquote>

This time the reply was:

<blockquote>
Contenox: 
<code>Task titled "delectus aut autem" is incomplete. Nothing to summarize here.</code>
</blockquote>

Wait. It worked? Just like that?




<h2>
 
 
 Under the hood: LLM → JavaScript → tools → LLM
</h2>

Looking at the execution trace made it clear what happened.

<h3>
 
 
 1. Input is normalized and moderated
</h3>

The workflow starts with:

<ol>
<li><code>mux_input</code></li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>
Parses the incoming chat history into a normalized <code>messages</code> array.

<ol>
<li><code>moderate</code></li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Uses a small model to classify the input as safe/unsafe.</li>
<li>Output: <code>0</code> → safe → continue.</li>
</ul>

So far this is standard workflow stuff.

<h3>
 
 
 2. <code>generate_js</code>: the LLM writes JavaScript
</h3>

Next, the <code>generate_js</code> task runs with a system instruction like:

<ul>
<li>“You are an expert JavaScript agent for the Contenox runtime…”</li>
<li>“You must output JSON: { "code": "" }”</li>
<li>“You can use httpFetch, executeTask, executeTaskChain, …”</li>
<li>“Script must be synchronous, no async/await, and must return a JSON-serializable object.”</li>
</ul>

Given the chat history, the model produced something like this (simplified): 


<div class="highlight js-code-highlight">
<pre class="highlight json"><code>{
 "code": "var result;
var answer;
var meta = { steps: [] };

var todoUrl = \"https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1\";

// Step 1: Fetch the TODO item
meta.steps.push(\"Fetching TODO item from \" + todoUrl);
var fetchResponse = httpFetch(todoUrl);

if (!fetchResponse.ok) {
 answer = \"I couldn't access that item right now because there was some trouble with getting it. Please check the URL or try again later.\";
 meta.error = {
 message: \"HTTP fetch failed\",
 url: todoUrl,
 status: fetchResponse.status,
 statusText: fetchResponse.statusText,
 body: fetchResponse.body,
 error: fetchResponse.error
 };
 result = { answer: answer, meta: meta };
} else {
 var todoItem;
 try {
 todoItem = JSON.parse(fetchResponse.body);
 meta.raw = todoItem;
 } catch (e) {
 answer = \"I fetched the item, but I couldn't understand its format. It doesn't seem to be valid JSON.\";
 meta.error = {
 message: \"JSON parse error\",
 rawBody: fetchResponse.body,
 parseError: e.toString()
 };
 result = { answer: answer, meta: meta };
 }

 if (todoItem) {
 // Step 2: Summarize the TODO item using an LLM
 meta.steps.push(\"Summarizing TODO item with LLM\");
 var prompt = \"Summarize the following TODO item in a concise sentence: \" + JSON.stringify(todoItem);
 var summarizeTask = executeTask(prompt, \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"openai\");

 if (!summarizeTask.success) {
 answer = \"While I managed to fetch your TODO details, the summary tool had a hiccup and couldn't provide me with a concise sentence right now. We seem to be experiencing some temporary issues.\";
 meta.error = {
 message: \"LLM task execution failed\",
 task_id: summarizeTask.task_id,
 error: summarizeTask.error
 };
 result = { answer: answer, meta: meta };
 } else {
 answer = summarizeTask.response;
 meta.llmResponse = summarizeTask.response;
 result = { answer: answer, meta: meta };
 }
 }
}

result;"
}
</code></pre>

</div>



A few important details here:

<ul>
<li>
It encodes error handling:

<ul>
<li>If HTTP fails → user-friendly <code>answer</code>, raw error in <code>meta.error</code>.</li>
<li>If JSON parse fails → similar pattern.</li>
<li>If the inner LLM call fails → fallback message.</li>
</ul>


</li>

<li>It delegates the actual summarization to another model via <code>executeTask</code>.</li>

<li>It returns a structured <code>result</code> with both <code>answer</code> and <code>meta</code>.</li>

</ul>

This is not the model “calling tools” directly. It’s the model writing a program that calls tools.

<h3>
 
 
 3. <code>run_js</code>: execute the code in a sandbox
</h3>

The next task is <code>run_js</code>, which is just a Contenox <code>hook</code> that calls the JS sandbox: 


<div class="highlight js-code-highlight">
<pre class="highlight json"><code>{
 "name": "js_sandbox",
 "tool_name": "execute_js",
 "args": {
 "code": "{{.generate_js.code}}"
 }
}
</code></pre>

</div>



Inside the trace you can see:

<ul>
<li>An <code>httpFetch</code> log for the JSONPlaceholder URL.</li>
<li>A response with <code>status: 200 OK</code> when things finally worked.</li>
<li>
An <code>executeTask</code> log with the summarization prompt:

<ul>
<li><code>Summarize the following TODO item in a concise sentence: {"userId":1,"id":1,"title":"delectus aut autem","completed":false}</code></li>
</ul>


</li>

</ul>

The sandbox result looked roughly like: 


<div class="highlight js-code-highlight">
<pre class="highlight json"><code>{
 "ok": true,
 "result": {
 "answer": "Task titled \"delectus aut autem\" is incomplete.",
 "meta": {
 "llmResponse": "Task titled \"delectus aut autem\" is incomplete.",
 "raw": {
 "userId": 1,
 "id": 1,
 "title": "delectus aut autem",
 "completed": false
 },
 "steps": [
 "Fetching TODO item from https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1",
 "Summarizing TODO item with LLM"
 ]
 }
 },
 "logs": [ ... ],
 "code": "var result; ..."
}
</code></pre>

</div>



<h3>
 
 
 4. <code>eval_js_result</code>: success or retry?
</h3>

Now comes the evaluator:

<ul>
<li>It receives a description of the JS sandbox output.</li>
<li>
The system prompt is very strict:

<ul>
<li>If <code>ok</code> is true and there is a non-empty <code>result.answer</code> → respond with <code>success</code>.</li>
<li>Otherwise → respond with <code>retry</code>.</li>
</ul>


</li>

</ul>

On the successful run, it answered: 


<div class="highlight js-code-highlight">
<pre class="highlight plaintext"><code>success
</code></pre>

</div>



So the workflow does not go into <code>repair_js</code> or <code>run_js_retry</code>. Happy path.

<h3>
 
 
 5. <code>answer</code>: extract the final user message
</h3>

The final task, <code>answer</code>, is intentionally boring:

<ul>
<li>System prompt: “You are a purely extractive post-processor. Do NOT invent content. Just surface the best existing <code>answer</code> field.”
</li>
<li>
It gets:

<ul>
<li>First run (<code>run_js</code> result).</li>
<li>Second run (<code>run_js_retry</code>), if any.</li>
</ul>


</li>

<li>

Selection rule:

<ul>
<li>Take the last non-empty <code>answer</code> you see.</li>
<li>Output it verbatim.</li>
</ul>


</li>

</ul>

In our case it found: 


<div class="highlight js-code-highlight">
<pre class="highlight plaintext"><code>Task titled "delectus aut autem" is incomplete.
</code></pre>

</div>



And that’s exactly what Contenox replied in chat.




<h2>
 
 
 Why this is interesting (to me, at least)
</h2>

What I originally set out to build:

<blockquote>
A runtime for deterministic, observable GenAI workflows. 
Tasks, transitions, hooks – all explicit and replayable.
</blockquote>

What I accidentally stumbled into:

<blockquote>
A multi-model, self-orchestrating agent pattern, 
where LLMs write code that uses tools, and the runtime executes and evaluates that code.
</blockquote>

The pattern looks like this:

<ol>
<li>
Planner LLM (<code>generate_js</code>)</li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>Reads user intent + history.</li>
<li>Emits JavaScript that calls <code>httpFetch</code>, <code>executeTask</code>, <code>executeTaskChain</code>, hooks, etc.</li>
</ul>

<ol>
<li>
Execution environment (<code>run_js</code> in Goja)</li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>Deterministic execution of that JS.</li>
<li>Full logs of every HTTP call, every inner LLM call, every step.</li>
</ul>

<ol>
<li>
Controller LLM (<code>eval_js_result</code>)</li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>Looks at the sandbox result.</li>
<li>Decides: is this good enough? Retry? Repair?</li>
</ul>

<ol>
<li>
Repair LLM (<code>repair_js</code>, if needed)</li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>Gets the previous code + error output.</li>
<li>Writes a fixed version of the JS.</li>
</ul>

<ol>
<li>
Answer LLM (<code>answer</code>)</li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>Doesn’t “reason” at all.</li>
<li>Just extracts the final <code>answer</code> text safely.</li>
</ul>

All of that is expressed as an explicit state machine in Contenox.

No hidden loops, no undocumented retries, no magic glue code inside some SDK. It’s all visible in the workflow graph and trace.




To me, that’s the exciting part:

<blockquote>
You don’t have to choose between “boring deterministic workflows” and “fancy agents”. 
You can build the agent on top of deterministic workflows. 
And everything stays **self-hosted, inspectable, and auditable if you want.
</blockquote>

يتناول المقال تجربة تم فيها السماح لنموذج ذكاء اصطناعي بكتابة كود جافا سكريبت داخل بيئة مستقلة تُدعى كونتينوكس. يتأمل الكاتب في مفهوم يتعلق باستخدام الأدوات في الذكاء الاصطناعي، مقترحًا أن النماذج يجب أن تولد كودًا لاستخدام الأدوات بدلاً من إجراء مكالمات مباشرة. تم اختبار هذا النهج من خلال تنفيذ كود جافا سكريبت الذي تم إنشاؤه داخل بيئة كونتينوكس، بهدف تحسين كفاءة سير العمل في الذكاء الاصطناعي.

El artículo discute un experimento en el que se permitió a un modelo de IA escribir código JavaScript dentro de un entorno autónomo llamado Contenox. El autor reflexiona sobre un concepto relacionado con el uso de herramientas en IA, sugiriendo que los modelos deberían generar código para utilizar herramientas en lugar de realizar llamadas directas. Este enfoque se probó ejecutando el JavaScript generado dentro del entorno Contenox, con el objetivo de mejorar la eficiencia de los flujos de trabajo de IA.

L'article traite d'une expérience où un modèle d'IA a été autorisé à écrire du code JavaScript au sein d'un environnement autonome appelé Contenox. L'auteur réfléchit à un concept concernant l'utilisation des outils en IA, suggérant que les modèles devraient générer du code pour utiliser des outils plutôt que d'effectuer des appels directs. Cette approche a été testée en exécutant le JavaScript généré dans l'environnement Contenox, visant à améliorer l'efficacité des flux de travail en IA.

The article discusses an experiment where an AI model was allowed to write JavaScript code within a self-hosted runtime called Contenox. The author reflects on a concept regarding tool usage in AI, suggesting that models should generate code to utilize tools instead of direct calls. This approach was tested by executing the generated JavaScript within the Contenox environment, aiming to enhance the efficiency of AI workflows.

I Let an LLM Write JavaScript Inside My AI Runtime. Here’s What Happened

<h1>
 
 
 Sector HQ Weekly Digest - November 17, 2025
</h1>

Who's shipping vs who's just talking? Here's this week's AI industry intelligence.

<h2>
 
 
 🏆 Top 10 Companies
</h2>

<ol>
<li>
OpenAI - Score: 442385.7 | 343 events this week</li>
<li>
Anthropic - Score: 266113.1 | 51 events this week</li>
<li>
Amazon - Score: 135242.8 | 22 events this week</li>
<li>
Nvidia - Score: 128360.7 | 161 events this week</li>
<li>
Google - Score: 111135.8 | 125 events this week</li>
<li>
Microsoft - Score: 95559.7 | 99 events this week</li>
<li>
Meta - Score: 78015.6 | 61 events this week</li>
<li>
Apple - Score: 64936.3 | 94 events this week</li>
<li>
Tesla - Score: 41242.1 | 12 events this week</li>
<li>
AMD - Score: 40235.9 | 43 events this week</li>
</ol>

<h2>
 
 
 📈 Biggest Movers
</h2>

<ul>
<li>↑ Sony jumped 277 positions to #58</li>
<li>↑ Stability AI jumped 183 positions to #78</li>
<li>↑ Bytedance jumped 143 positions to #68</li>
<li>↑ Scale AI jumped 122 positions to #66</li>
<li>↑ Palantir jumped 107 positions to #17</li>
</ul>

<h2>
 
 
 🚨 Hype Gap Alerts
</h2>

No high hype alerts this week

<h2>
 
 
 📊 Key Insights
</h2>

<ul>
<li>Total companies tracked: 100</li>
<li>Total events this week: 1317</li>
<li>Average activity per company: 13.2 events</li>
</ul>

<h2>
 
 
 💡 What This Means
</h2>

The AI industry continues to evolve rapidly. Companies that ship consistently rise in our rankings, while those focused on hype alone get flagged by our Hype Gap detector.

Methodology: Our leaderboard tracks real product releases, funding events, partnerships, and market traction - not just PR and social media buzz.




Want real-time updates? Check out the live leaderboard at <a href="https://sectorhq.co" rel="noopener noreferrer">sectorhq.co</a>

Track specific companies and get instant alerts when they move in the rankings.

<h2>
 
 
 Tags
</h2>

<h1>
 
 
 AI #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #TechIndustry #Startups #AILeaderboard
</h1>

تسليط الضوء على أحدث التطورات في صناعة الذكاء الاصطناعي في نشرة قطاع HQ الأسبوعية بتاريخ 17 نوفمبر 2025، مع التركيز على أداء الشركات الرائدة. تتصدر OpenAI القائمة برصيد 442385.7 و343 حدثًا، تليها Anthropic وAmazon. كما يشير التقرير إلى تحركات كبيرة، حيث قفزت Sony 277 مركزًا في الترتيب، مما يعكس الطبيعة الديناميكية للقطاع.

El Digest semanal de Sector HQ del 17 de noviembre de 2025 destaca los últimos desarrollos en la industria de la IA, centrándose en el rendimiento de las principales empresas. OpenAI lidera con una puntuación de 442385.7 y 343 eventos, seguido de Anthropic y Amazon. El informe también señala movimientos significativos, con Sony saltando 277 posiciones en el ranking, reflejando la naturaleza dinámica del sector de la IA.

Le Digest hebdomadaire du Secteur HQ du 17 novembre 2025 met en lumière les derniers développements de l'industrie de l'IA, en se concentrant sur la performance des principales entreprises. OpenAI est en tête avec un score de 442385,7 et 343 événements, suivi d'Anthropic et d'Amazon. Le rapport note également des mouvements significatifs, Sony ayant grimpé de 277 positions dans le classement, reflétant la nature dynamique du secteur de l'IA.

The Sector HQ Weekly Digest for November 17, 2025, highlights the latest developments in the AI industry, focusing on the performance of top companies. OpenAI leads with a score of 442385.7 and 343 events, followed by Anthropic and Amazon. The report also notes significant movements, with Sony jumping 277 positions in the rankings, reflecting the dynamic nature of the AI sector.

Sector HQ Weekly Digest - November 17, 2025

arXiv:2511.10693v1 Announce Type: new 
Abstract: Voice-based artificial intelligence is increasingly expected to adhere to human social conventions, but can it learn implicit cues that are not explicitly programmed? This study investigates whether state-of-the-art text-to-speech systems have internalized the human tendency to reduce speech rate to convey politeness - a non-obvious prosodic marker. We prompted 22 synthetic voices from two leading AI platforms (AI Studio and OpenAI) to read a fixed script under both "polite and formal" and "casual and informal" conditions and measured the resulting speech duration. Across both AI platforms, the polite prompt produced slower speech than the casual prompt with very large effect sizes, an effect that was statistically significant for all of AI Studio's voices and for a large majority of OpenAI's voices. These results demonstrate that AI can implicitly learn and replicate psychological nuances of human communication, highlighting its emerging role as a social actor capable of reinforcing human social norms.

تدرس دراسة حديثة نُشرت على arXiv ما إذا كانت أنظمة تحويل النص إلى كلام المتقدمة يمكن أن تتعلم الفروق الاجتماعية، وخاصة الميل البشري لتقليل سرعة الكلام للتعبير عن الأدب. اختبر الباحثون 22 صوتًا صناعيًا من AI Studio وOpenAI في ظروف رسمية وغير رسمية، ووجدوا أن العبارات المهذبة أدت إلى كلام أبطأ بشكل كبير عبر كلا النظامين. يشير هذا إلى أن الذكاء الاصطناعي يمكن أن يستوعب ويعيد إنتاج الإشارات النفسية الدقيقة في التواصل البشري.

Un estudio reciente publicado en arXiv investiga si los sistemas avanzados de texto a voz pueden aprender matices sociales, específicamente la tendencia humana a reducir la velocidad del habla para transmitir cortesía. Los investigadores probaron 22 voces sintéticas de AI Studio y OpenAI en condiciones de cortesía y casualidad, encontrando que los mensajes corteses resultaron en un habla significativamente más lenta en ambas plataformas. Esto sugiere que la IA puede internalizar y replicar sutiles señales psicológicas en la comunicación humana.

Une étude récente publiée sur arXiv examine si les systèmes avancés de synthèse vocale peuvent apprendre des nuances sociales, en particulier la tendance humaine à ralentir la parole pour exprimer la politesse. Les chercheurs ont testé 22 voix synthétiques d'AI Studio et d'OpenAI dans des conditions polies et décontractées, constatant que les prompts polis entraînaient un discours significativement plus lent sur les deux plateformes. Cela suggère que l'IA peut intérioriser et reproduire des indices psychologiques subtils dans la communication humaine.

A recent study published on arXiv investigates whether advanced text-to-speech systems can learn social nuances, specifically the human tendency to slow speech for politeness. Researchers tested 22 synthetic voices from AI Studio and OpenAI under polite and casual conditions, finding that the polite prompts resulted in significantly slower speech across both platforms. This suggests that AI can internalize and replicate subtle psychological cues in human communication.

Do AI Voices Learn Social Nuances? A Case of Politeness and Speech Rate

<A HREF="https://www.ft.com/content/3569eaed-d031-4d04-af79-3b3d7c6e836f"><IMG VSPACE="4" HSPACE="4" BORDER="0" ALIGN="RIGHT" SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/251119/i38.jpg"></A>
<A HREF="http://www.techmeme.com/251119/p38#a251119p38" TITLE="Techmeme permalink"><IMG WIDTH=11 HEIGHT=12 SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/img/pml.png" STYLE="border:none;padding:0;margin:0;"></A> Anna Nicolaou / <A HREF="https://www.ft.com/">Financial Times</A>: 
<A HREF="https://www.ft.com/content/3569eaed-d031-4d04-af79-3b3d7c6e836f">Sources: Warner Music settles its suit with AI startup Udio, which is planning a service that lets users create songs from licensed tracks of artists who opt-in</A>&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Agreement with Udio could allow fans to create their own songs using licensed tracks if artists opt in

توصلت وارنر ميوزيك إلى تسوية مع شركة الذكاء الاصطناعي Udio، التي تطور خدمة تتيح للمستخدمين إنشاء أغاني باستخدام مقاطع مرخصة من الفنانين الذين يختارون المشاركة. قد يمكّن هذا الاتفاق المعجبين من التفاعل بشكل أكثر إبداعًا مع الموسيقى من خلال إعادة مزج وتخصيص المقاطع بشكل قانوني.

Warner Music ha llegado a un acuerdo en su demanda contra la startup de IA Udio, que está desarrollando un servicio que permite a los usuarios crear canciones a partir de pistas licenciadas de artistas que eligen participar. Este acuerdo podría permitir a los fanáticos involucrarse de manera más creativa con la música al remixar y personalizar pistas legalmente.

Warner Music a réglé son procès avec la startup d'IA Udio, qui développe un service permettant aux utilisateurs de créer des chansons à partir de morceaux licenciés d'artistes qui choisissent de participer. Cet accord pourrait permettre aux fans de s'engager plus créativement avec la musique en remixant et en personnalisant légalement des morceaux.

Warner Music has settled its lawsuit with AI startup Udio, which is developing a service that enables users to create songs using licensed tracks from artists who choose to participate. This agreement could empower fans to engage more creatively with music by remixing and personalizing tracks legally.

Sources: Warner Music settles its suit with AI startup Udio, which is planning a service that lets users create songs from licensed tracks of artists who opt-in (Anna Nicolaou/Financial Times)

<A HREF="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-19/musk-s-xai-to-build-500-megawatt-data-center-in-saudi-arabia"><IMG VSPACE="4" HSPACE="4" BORDER="0" ALIGN="RIGHT" SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/251119/i36.jpg"></A>
<A HREF="http://www.techmeme.com/251119/p36#a251119p36" TITLE="Techmeme permalink"><IMG WIDTH=11 HEIGHT=12 SRC="http://www.techmeme.com/img/pml.png" STYLE="border:none;padding:0;margin:0;"></A> Mark Bergen / <A HREF="https://www.bloomberg.com/">Bloomberg</A>: 
<A HREF="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-19/musk-s-xai-to-build-500-megawatt-data-center-in-saudi-arabia">Elon Musk says xAI plans to develop a 500 megawatt data center in Saudi Arabia with state-backed AI startup Humain; the data center will rely on Nvidia chips</A>&nbsp; &mdash;&nbsp; Elon Musk said his xAI artificial intelligence startup plans to develop a 500 megawatt data center in Saudi Arabia &hellip;

أعلن إيلون ماسك أن شركته الناشئة في الذكاء الاصطناعي، xAI، تخطط لتطوير مركز بيانات بقدرة 500 ميغاوات في المملكة العربية السعودية بالتعاون مع شركة Humain المدعومة من الدولة. سيعتمد مركز البيانات على رقائق Nvidia، مما يمثل استثمارًا كبيرًا في بنية الذكاء الاصطناعي التحتية في المنطقة.

Elon Musk anunció que su startup de inteligencia artificial, xAI, planea desarrollar un centro de datos de 500 megavatios en Arabia Saudita en colaboración con la startup de IA respaldada por el estado, Humain. El centro de datos utilizará chips de Nvidia, marcando una inversión significativa en la infraestructura de IA de la región.

Elon Musk a annoncé que sa startup d'intelligence artificielle, xAI, prévoit de développer un centre de données de 500 mégawatts en Arabie Saoudite en collaboration avec la startup d'IA soutenue par l'État, Humain. Le centre de données utilisera des puces Nvidia, marquant un investissement significatif dans l'infrastructure IA de la région.

Elon Musk announced that his artificial intelligence startup, xAI, plans to develop a 500 megawatt data center in Saudi Arabia in collaboration with the state-backed AI startup Humain. The data center will utilize Nvidia chips, marking a significant investment in the region's AI infrastructure.

Elon Musk says xAI plans to develop a 500 megawatt data center in Saudi Arabia with state-backed AI startup Humain; the data center will rely on Nvidia chips (Mark Bergen/Bloomberg)

Microsoft signs a deal with a legal advocacy group to resolve claims it denied discounts to conservative religious nonprofits; OpenAI and Asana also made deals (Jeff Green/Bloomberg)

Was this article worth reading? Share it