Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following

arXiv — cs.CLWednesday, November 12, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
The introduction of IFBench marks a significant advancement in assessing how well language models and chatbots can follow intricate human instructions. While existing models have shown proficiency in a narrow range of verifiable constraints, they struggle to generalize to new, unseen instructions. This limitation hampers effective human-AI interaction, making the development of robust benchmarks essential. The study not only presents IFBench, which includes 58 diverse constraints, but also emphasizes the potential of reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to enhance these models' performance. By releasing 29 additional hand-annotated training constraints and verification functions, the research aims to provide a comprehensive framework for improving precise instruction following, ultimately fostering more effective communication between humans and AI.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended Readings
EvoLM: In Search of Lost Language Model Training Dynamics
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
EvoLM is a new model suite designed to analyze the training dynamics of language models (LMs) across various stages, including pre-training and fine-tuning. By training over 100 LMs with 1B and 4B parameters, EvoLM provides insights into the effectiveness of design choices and their impact on both language modeling and problem-solving capabilities. Key findings emphasize the diminishing returns of excessive pre-training and the importance of continued pre-training to mitigate forgetting during domain-specific tasks.
On the Entropy Calibration of Language Models
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The paper examines entropy calibration in language models, focusing on whether their entropy aligns with log loss on human text. Previous studies indicated that as text generation lengthens, entropy increases while text quality declines, highlighting a fundamental issue in autoregressive models. The authors investigate whether miscalibration can improve with scale and if calibration without tradeoffs is theoretically feasible, analyzing the scaling behavior concerning dataset size and power law exponents.
LDC: Learning to Generate Research Idea with Dynamic Control
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight their potential in automating scientific research ideation. Current methods often produce ideas that do not meet expert standards of novelty, feasibility, and effectiveness. To address these issues, a new framework is proposed that combines Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and controllable Reinforcement Learning (RL) to enhance the quality of generated research ideas through a two-stage approach.
Behaviour Policy Optimization: Provably Lower Variance Return Estimates for Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The paper titled 'Behaviour Policy Optimization: Provably Lower Variance Return Estimates for Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning' addresses the challenges of high-variance return estimates in reinforcement learning algorithms. It highlights that well-designed behavior policies can collect off-policy data, leading to lower variance return estimates. This finding suggests that on-policy data collection is not optimal for variance, and the authors extend this insight to online reinforcement learning, where policy evaluation and improvement occur simultaneously.
Mining--Gym: A Configurable RL Benchmarking Environment for Truck Dispatch Scheduling
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Mining-Gym is introduced as a configurable, open-source benchmarking environment aimed at optimizing truck dispatch scheduling in mining operations. The dynamic and stochastic nature of mining environments, characterized by uncertainties such as equipment failures and variable haul cycle times, poses challenges to traditional optimization methods. By leveraging Reinforcement Learning (RL), Mining-Gym provides a platform for training, testing, and evaluating RL algorithms, enhancing the efficiency and adaptability of decision-making in mining logistics.
Thinker: Training LLMs in Hierarchical Thinking for Deep Search via Multi-Turn Interaction
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The article presents Thinker, a hierarchical thinking model designed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) through multi-turn interactions. Unlike previous methods that relied on end-to-end reinforcement learning without supervision, Thinker allows for a more structured reasoning process by breaking down complex problems into manageable sub-problems. Each sub-problem is represented in both natural language and logical functions, improving the coherence and rigor of the reasoning process.
DiAReL: Reinforcement Learning with Disturbance Awareness for Robust Sim2Real Policy Transfer in Robot Control
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The paper titled 'DiAReL: Reinforcement Learning with Disturbance Awareness for Robust Sim2Real Policy Transfer in Robot Control' discusses the introduction of a disturbance-augmented Markov decision process (DAMDP) to enhance reinforcement learning in robotic control. It addresses the challenges of sim2real transfer, where models trained in simulation often fail to perform effectively in real-world scenarios due to discrepancies in system dynamics. The proposed approach aims to improve the robustness and stabilization of control responses in robotic systems.
Studies with impossible languages falsify LMs as models of human language
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A study published on arXiv examines the learning capabilities of infants and language models (LMs) regarding attested versus impossible languages. The research indicates that both groups find attested languages easier to learn than those with unnatural structures. However, the findings reveal that LMs can learn many impossible languages as effectively as attested ones. The study suggests that the complexity of these languages, rather than their impossibility, contributes to the challenges faced by LMs, which lack the human inductive biases essential for language acquisition.