A recent discussion among developers about structuring an API response format highlighted differing opinions on whether to use nested objects, flat structures, or hybrid approaches. Each participant presented valid reasons and cited best practices, convinced that their logic was the most appropriate. However, the product manager's intervention, by questioning the actual problem being solved, shifted the focus of the debate. This exchange illustrates that logic, often considered objective, can be influenced by differing perspectives and underlying assumptions. The case suggests that what is deemed logical depends on context and goals rather than purely objective criteria. Consequently, the notion that logic is entirely objective remains debated, as demonstrated in this practical scenario.