Diagnosing Hallucination Risk in AI Surgical Decision-Support: A Sequential Framework for Sequential Validation

arXiv — cs.LGFriday, November 21, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • A new framework has been introduced to evaluate hallucination risks in AI surgical decision-support, focusing on diagnostic precision and recommendation quality among leading LLMs.
  • This development is significant as it aims to enhance patient safety by quantifying the risks associated with AI outputs in high-stakes medical environments, particularly in spine surgery.
  • The ongoing challenge of hallucinations in LLMs highlights a broader concern in AI applications, where the balance between advanced reasoning capabilities and factual accuracy remains a critical issue.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
LLMSQL: Upgrading WikiSQL for the LLM Era of Text-to-SQL
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
LLMSQL has been introduced as an upgraded version of WikiSQL, addressing various structural and annotation issues that have hindered its effectiveness in converting natural language questions into SQL queries. This systematic revision aims to enhance the interaction of non-expert users with relational databases in the context of large language models (LLMs).
Can Slow-thinking LLMs Reason Over Time? Empirical Studies in Time Series Forecasting
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Recent empirical studies have explored the capabilities of slow-thinking large language models (LLMs) like DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-o1 in time series forecasting (TSF), proposing a new framework called TimeReasoner that treats TSF as a conditional reasoning task. This approach aims to enhance the models' ability to reason over temporal patterns, potentially improving forecasting accuracy even in zero-shot scenarios.
Is PRM Necessary? Problem-Solving RL Implicitly Induces PRM Capability in LLMs
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
Recent research indicates that large language models (LLMs) can enhance their reasoning capabilities through pure reinforcement learning (RL) focused on problem-solving, without the need for process reward models (PRMs). This finding challenges the traditional belief that PRMs are essential for developing reasoning skills in LLMs, as demonstrated by the DeepSeek-R1 model.