Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
- Recent research highlights significant epistemological differences between human cognition and large language models (LLMs), arguing that LLMs function as stochastic pattern-completion systems rather than true epistemic agents. This study identifies seven key fault lines, including grounding and causal reasoning, which illustrate the limitations of LLMs in mimicking human-like understanding.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for developers and researchers in artificial intelligence, as it informs the design and application of LLMs in various contexts, ensuring that their capabilities and limitations are appropriately recognized.
- The ongoing discourse surrounding LLMs raises important questions about their role in strategic decision-making and content generation, as seen in applications like gaming and educational assessments. This highlights a broader debate on the implications of AI in human-centered tasks and the potential for misalignment between machine outputs and human cognitive processes.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System


