Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence

arXiv — cs.CLTuesday, December 23, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • Recent research highlights significant epistemological differences between human cognition and large language models (LLMs), arguing that LLMs function as stochastic pattern-completion systems rather than true epistemic agents. This study identifies seven key fault lines, including grounding and causal reasoning, which illustrate the limitations of LLMs in mimicking human-like understanding.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for developers and researchers in artificial intelligence, as it informs the design and application of LLMs in various contexts, ensuring that their capabilities and limitations are appropriately recognized.
  • The ongoing discourse surrounding LLMs raises important questions about their role in strategic decision-making and content generation, as seen in applications like gaming and educational assessments. This highlights a broader debate on the implications of AI in human-centered tasks and the potential for misalignment between machine outputs and human cognitive processes.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
AI and high-throughput testing reveal stability limits in organic redox flow batteries
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and high-throughput testing have unveiled the stability limits of organic redox flow batteries, showcasing the potential of these technologies to enhance scientific research and innovation.
AI’s Hacking Skills Are Approaching an ‘Inflection Point’
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
AI models are increasingly proficient at identifying software vulnerabilities, prompting experts to suggest that the tech industry must reconsider its software development practices. This advancement indicates a significant shift in the capabilities of AI technologies, particularly in cybersecurity.
Attention Projection Mixing and Exogenous Anchors
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A new study introduces ExoFormer, a transformer model that utilizes exogenous anchor projections to enhance attention mechanisms, addressing the challenge of balancing stability and computational efficiency in deep learning architectures. This model demonstrates improved performance metrics, including a notable increase in downstream accuracy and data efficiency compared to traditional internal-anchor transformers.
User-Oriented Multi-Turn Dialogue Generation with Tool Use at scale
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A new framework for user-oriented multi-turn dialogue generation has been developed, leveraging large reasoning models (LRMs) to create dynamic, domain-specific tools for task completion. This approach addresses the limitations of existing datasets that rely on static toolsets, enhancing the interaction quality in human-agent collaborations.
Detecting Mental Manipulation in Speech via Synthetic Multi-Speaker Dialogue
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A new study has introduced the SPEECHMENTALMANIP benchmark, marking the first exploration of mental manipulation detection in spoken dialogues, utilizing synthetic multi-speaker audio to enhance a text-based dataset. This research highlights the challenges of identifying manipulative speech tactics, revealing that models trained on audio exhibit lower recall compared to text.
Compliance-to-Code: Enhancing Financial Compliance Checking via Code Generation
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The recent development in financial compliance checking involves the introduction of Compliance-to-Code, which leverages Regulatory Technology and Large Language Models to automate the conversion of complex regulatory text into executable compliance logic. This innovation aims to address the challenges posed by intricate financial regulations, particularly in the context of Chinese-language regulations, where existing models have shown suboptimal performance due to various limitations.
RULERS: Locked Rubrics and Evidence-Anchored Scoring for Robust LLM Evaluation
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The recent introduction of RULERS (Rubric Unification, Locking, and Evidence-anchored Robust Scoring) addresses challenges in evaluating large language models (LLMs) by transforming natural language rubrics into executable specifications, thereby enhancing the reliability of assessments.
QuantEval: A Benchmark for Financial Quantitative Tasks in Large Language Models
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The introduction of QuantEval marks a significant advancement in evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in financial quantitative tasks, focusing on knowledge-based question answering, mathematical reasoning, and strategy coding. This benchmark incorporates a backtesting framework that assesses the performance of model-generated strategies using financial metrics, providing a more realistic evaluation of LLM capabilities.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about