Agentic Policy Optimization via Instruction-Policy Co-Evolution

arXiv — cs.LGTuesday, December 2, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • A novel framework named INSPO has been introduced to enhance reinforcement learning through dynamic instruction optimization, addressing the limitations of static instructions in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). This approach allows for a more adaptive learning process, where instruction candidates evolve alongside the agent's policy, improving multi-turn reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs).
  • The development of INSPO is significant as it represents a shift towards more autonomous learning systems, enabling LLMs to refine their instructions based on performance feedback. This could lead to more effective and versatile AI agents capable of complex reasoning tasks without extensive manual intervention.
  • This advancement reflects a broader trend in AI research focusing on enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs through innovative frameworks. The integration of curiosity-driven learning and Bayesian inference in other models indicates a growing recognition of the need for dynamic learning environments that can adapt to changing contexts and improve overall model performance.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
LLMs choose friends and colleagues like people, researchers find
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Researchers have found that large language models (LLMs) make decisions about networking and friendship in ways that closely resemble human behavior, both in synthetic simulations and real-world contexts. This suggests that LLMs can replicate social decision-making processes similar to those of people.
AI’s Wrong Answers Are Bad. Its Wrong Reasoning Is Worse
NegativeArtificial Intelligence
Recent studies reveal that while AI, particularly generative AI, has improved in accuracy, its flawed reasoning processes pose significant risks in critical sectors such as healthcare, law, and education. These findings highlight the need for a deeper understanding of AI's decision-making mechanisms.
Capturing Context-Aware Route Choice Semantics for Trajectory Representation Learning
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
A new framework named CORE has been proposed for trajectory representation learning (TRL), which aims to enhance the encoding of raw trajectory data into low-dimensional embeddings by integrating context-aware route choice semantics. This approach addresses the limitations of existing TRL methods that treat trajectories as static sequences, thereby enriching the semantic representation of urban mobility patterns.
An Interdisciplinary and Cross-Task Review on Missing Data Imputation
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A comprehensive review on missing data imputation highlights the challenges posed by incomplete datasets across various fields, including healthcare and e-commerce. The study synthesizes decades of research, categorizing imputation methods from classical techniques to modern machine learning approaches, emphasizing the need for a unified framework to address missingness mechanisms and imputation goals.
Influence Functions for Efficient Data Selection in Reasoning
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study has introduced influence functions as a method for efficient data selection in reasoning tasks, particularly for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on chain-of-thought (CoT) data. This approach aims to define data quality more effectively, moving beyond traditional heuristics like problem difficulty and trace length. Influence-based pruning has shown to outperform existing methods in math reasoning tasks.
Escaping Collapse: The Strength of Weak Data for Large Language Model Training
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Recent research has formalized the role of synthetically-generated data in training large language models (LLMs), highlighting that without proper curation, model performance can plateau or collapse. The study introduces a theoretical framework to determine the necessary curation levels to ensure continuous improvement in LLM performance, drawing inspiration from the boosting technique in machine learning.
Human researchers are superior to large language models in writing a medical systematic review in a comparative multitask assessment
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published in Nature — Machine Learning found that human researchers outperformed large language models in writing a medical systematic review during a comparative multitask assessment. This research highlights the limitations of current AI capabilities in complex academic writing tasks, particularly in the medical field.