Cost-Minimized Label-Flipping Poisoning Attack to LLM Alignment

arXiv — cs.LGThursday, November 13, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
The publication titled 'Cost-Minimized Label-Flipping Poisoning Attack to LLM Alignment' presents a theoretical analysis of vulnerabilities in large language models (LLMs), particularly focusing on the risks associated with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and data poisoning optimization (DPO). By formulating a minimum-cost poisoning attack as a convex optimization problem, the study provides insights into how attackers can manipulate LLM policies with minimal resource expenditure. Empirical results demonstrate that existing label-flipping attacks can be enhanced through a cost-minimization post-processing method, significantly reducing the number of label flips needed while maintaining the attack's effectiveness. This research underscores fundamental vulnerabilities in current AI alignment strategies, calling for urgent attention to enhance the security of LLMs against potential data poisoning threats.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
Explaining Generalization of AI-Generated Text Detectors Through Linguistic Analysis
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv investigates the generalization capabilities of AI-generated text detectors, revealing that while these detectors perform well on in-domain benchmarks, they often fail to generalize across various generation conditions, such as unseen prompts and different model families. The research employs a comprehensive benchmark involving multiple prompting strategies and large language models to analyze performance variance through linguistic features.
Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study titled 'Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations' highlights the limitations of current confidence estimation methods for large language models (LLMs), emphasizing the need for evaluations that account for language variations and semantic differences. The research proposes a new framework that assesses confidence quality based on robustness, stability, and sensitivity to variations in prompts and answers.
BenchOverflow: Measuring Overflow in Large Language Models via Plain-Text Prompts
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study titled 'BenchOverflow' investigates a failure mode in large language models (LLMs) where plain-text prompts lead to excessive outputs, termed Overflow. This phenomenon can increase operational costs, latency, and degrade performance across users, particularly in high-demand environments.
Nationality and Region Prediction from Names: A Comparative Study of Neural Models and Large Language Models
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv compares the effectiveness of neural models and large language models (LLMs) in predicting nationality and region from personal names. The research evaluates six neural models and six LLM prompting strategies across three levels of granularity, revealing that LLMs consistently outperform traditional models in accuracy.
Semantic Gravity Wells: Why Negative Constraints Backfire
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv investigates the phenomenon of negative constraints in large language models, revealing that such instructions often lead to unexpected failures. The research introduces the concept of semantic pressure, which quantitatively measures the likelihood of generating forbidden tokens, and establishes a logistic relationship between violation probability and semantic pressure.
What If TSF: A Benchmark for Reframing Forecasting as Scenario-Guided Multimodal Forecasting
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The introduction of What If TSF (WIT) marks a significant advancement in time series forecasting by establishing a benchmark for scenario-guided multimodal forecasting. This new framework aims to evaluate the ability of models to condition forecasts on contextual text, particularly future scenarios, moving beyond traditional unimodal approaches that rely solely on historical data.
Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQL
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Arctic-Text2SQL-R1 has been introduced as a reinforcement learning framework aimed at improving the accuracy of SQL generation from natural language queries. This model leverages a simple reward signal based on execution correctness, addressing the challenges faced by large language models in producing executable SQL, particularly for complex queries.
Alleviating Attention Hacking in Discriminative Reward Modeling through Interaction Distillation
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A new study proposes a framework called Interaction Distillation to enhance discriminative reward modeling in large language models (LLMs), addressing vulnerabilities in token-level interaction that can lead to attention hacking. This framework aims to improve the reliability of reward signals generated during reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF).

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about