This matters because it reflects the ongoing debate about the responsibility of tech companies in addressing the negative effects of social media on society. Clegg's position may influence public perception and policy discussions.

Instead of recognising that social media harms mental health and democracy, the former deputy PM and Meta executive repeats company talking pointsNick Clegg chooses difficult jobs. He was the UK’s deputy prime minister from 2010 to 2015, a position from which he was surely pulled in multiple directions as he attempted to bridge the divide between David Cameron’s Conservatives and his own Liberal Democrats. A few years later he chose another challenging role, serving as Meta’s vice-president and then president of global affairs from 2018 until January 2025, where he was responsible for bridging the very different worlds of Silicon Valley and Washington DC (as&nbsp;well as other governments). How to Save the Internet is Clegg’s report on how he handled that Herculean task, along with his ideas for how to make the relationships between tech companies and regulators more cooperative and effective in the future.The main threat that Clegg addresses in the book is not one caused by the internet; it is the threat to the internet from those who would regulate it. As he puts it: “The real purpose of this book is not to defend myself or Meta or big tech. It is to raise the alarm about what I&nbsp;believe are the truly profound stakes for the future of the internet and for who gets to benefit from these revolutionary new technologies.” <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/sep/10/how-to-save-the-internet-by-nick-clegg-review-spinning-silicon-valley">Continue reading...</a>

هذا مهم لأنه يعكس النقاش المستمر حول مسؤولية شركات التكنولوجيا في معالجة الآثار السلبية لوسائل التواصل الاجتماعي على المجتمع. قد تؤثر وجهة نظر كليغ على التصورات العامة والنقاشات السياسية.

تنتقد مراجعة نيك كليغ تأثير وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي على الصحة العقلية والديمقراطية، مشيرة إلى توافقه مع آراء ميتا بدلاً من الاعتراف بالأضرار.

Esto es importante porque refleja el debate continuo sobre la responsabilidad de las empresas tecnológicas en abordar los efectos negativos de las redes sociales en la sociedad. La posición de Clegg podría influir en la percepción pública y en las discusiones políticas.

La crítica de Nick Clegg destaca el impacto de las redes sociales en la salud mental y la democracia, subrayando su alineación con las opiniones de Meta en lugar de reconocer los daños.

Cela importe car cela reflète le débat en cours sur la responsabilité des entreprises technologiques face aux effets négatifs des réseaux sociaux sur la société. La position de Clegg pourrait influencer la perception publique et les discussions politiques.

La critique de Nick Clegg souligne l'impact des réseaux sociaux sur la santé mentale et la démocratie, mettant en avant son alignement avec les vues de Meta plutôt que de reconnaître les dommages.

Nick Clegg's review critiques social media's impact on mental health and democracy, highlighting his alignment with Meta's views rather than acknowledging the harms.

How to Save the Internet by Nick Clegg review – spinning Silicon Valley

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Corners of internet

Green Wedge

Cato Networks

AI Brother is Watching You

Mymind

MindPrism AI

Ready to build your own newsroom?