Six months in, how Trump has changed the Education Department.

A new study is challenging the widely accepted idea that we need to hit 10,000 daily steps for good health. Now, experts are questioning whether other health benchmarks—like eight glasses of water, eight hours of sleep, or 150 minutes of weekly exercise—are equally oversimplified. Turns out, rigid rules might not be one-size-fits-all.

Editor’s Note: We’ve all heard the golden rules for staying healthy, but science evolves—and so should our habits. This story matters because it nudges us to think critically about blanket health advice. Maybe the real key is tuning into what your body actually needs, not just following a rigid checklist.

This article dives into the often-overlooked physical challenges female athletes face—like menstrual cycles, breast discomfort, and injury risks—and how addressing these issues head-on is helping women perform at their best. It’s not just about breaking barriers; it’s about tailoring sports science to women’s bodies, which has long been neglected.

Editor’s Note: For years, women’s sports have been squeezed into frameworks designed for men, ignoring unique biological factors. By openly discussing these hurdles, athletes and scientists are finally optimizing performance for women, not just adapting male-centric approaches. This isn’t just progress—it’s a game-changer for fairness and excellence in sports.

The head of Health and Human Services, RFK Jr., is reportedly planning to replace the entire panel responsible for deciding which cancer screenings and preventive health services insurers must cover for free. This group plays a key role in shaping what essential care Americans can access without out-of-pocket costs—think mammograms, colonoscopies, or vaccines.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just bureaucratic shuffling—it could directly impact what health services you get for free under the Affordable Care Act. If the panel’s membership or priorities shift, insurers might stop covering certain screenings or treatments, leaving patients to foot the bill. It’s a move that could ripple through preventive care, especially for cancer detection and chronic disease management. Watch this space.

A joint investigation by NBC News and KFF Health News uncovered over 200 lawsuits against major cosmetic surgery chains, with patients alleging severe complications—including disfigurement and even death. One woman, Erin Schaeffer, shared her harrowing experience after a tummy tuck and liposuction at Sono Bello, describing unbearable pain and a life-threatening infection. While the company defends its practices, claiming patient safety is a priority, the lawsuits paint a troubling picture of an industry expanding rapidly while facing serious accountability questions.

Editor’s Note: Cosmetic surgery chains are booming, but this investigation suggests their growth might be outpacing patient safety measures. For anyone considering these procedures—often marketed as quick fixes—it’s a stark reminder to research providers thoroughly. Beyond individual cases, it raises bigger questions about oversight in an industry where profit and aesthetics can sometimes overshadow medical ethics.

Health Secretary RFK Jr. is reportedly thinking about cleaning house at the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force—the expert panel that advises on things like when to get cancer screenings or other preventive care. If he follows through, it could mean a total shake-up of who’s calling the shots on these critical health recommendations.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just bureaucratic shuffling—the task force’s guidance directly impacts what preventive services insurers cover, from mammograms to heart disease checks. Firing the whole group could signal big (and controversial) changes ahead for public health priorities. Whether you see that as a needed overhaul or a risky power grab probably depends on your trust in the current administration’s health agenda.