Why are tick bites sending so many people to the emergency room this summer?

The White House has revealed that President Trump was recently diagnosed with a common circulatory issue after experiencing swelling in his legs. He underwent a full medical check-up, and officials are downplaying concerns, framing it as a routine and manageable condition.

Editor’s Note: Presidents' health is always under scrutiny—it affects public confidence and political stability. While this doesn’t seem serious, any medical news about a leader, especially one as polarizing as Trump, fuels speculation. It’s a reminder that even heads of state aren’t immune to everyday health hiccups.

Scientists have successfully used a controversial IVF technique to help eight babies be born free of a deadly genetic disease. The method, called "three-parent IVF," combines DNA from three people—the mother, father, and an egg donor—to prevent mothers from passing on harmful mitochondrial mutations. While it’s a breakthrough for families at risk of these conditions, the procedure remains banned in many countries, including Canada and the U.S., over ethical and safety concerns.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about scientific progress—it’s about real families who might now avoid the heartbreak of losing a child to inherited diseases. But the legal bans show how tricky this tech is: it pushes boundaries in genetics, ethics, and regulation. The debate isn’t going away, especially as more babies are born this way elsewhere in the world.

Lawmakers are taking action against harmful chemicals found in hair and beauty products, many of which are heavily marketed to Black women. Four new bills were introduced this week to either ban or tighten regulations on these ingredients, which have been linked to serious health risks like cancer.

Editor’s Note: For years, certain hair relaxers, dyes, and other products—often pushed toward Black women—have contained questionable chemicals with little oversight. This move signals a long-overdue effort to protect consumers from hidden dangers in everyday grooming items. It’s not just about safety; it’s about equity, since these products disproportionately affect a community already facing healthcare disparities. If passed, these bills could mean safer shelves and fewer health scares down the line.

A group of experts advising the FDA is taking another look at the warnings tied to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for menopause. This isn’t about new risks—it’s about whether the current caution labels, which were sparked by concerns over heart disease and cancer risks two decades ago, still match the latest science. Some doctors argue the warnings scared women away from a treatment that could help them, while others say better safe than sorry.

Editor’s Note: Hormone therapy can be a game-changer for brutal menopause symptoms, but the debate over its risks has left many women and doctors stuck in a "damned if you do, damned if you don’t" limbo. If the panel updates its guidance, it could shift how millions approach menopause care—either easing fears or doubling down on caution. Either way, it’s a big deal for anyone who’s ever Googled "Is HRT safe?" at 3 a.m.

After years of regulatory limbo, the FDA has finally given Juul the green light to keep its vaping products on the market. This decision comes despite past controversies over teen vaping and health concerns, signaling a shift—or at least a compromise—in how regulators view e-cigarettes.

Editor’s Note: Love ’em or hate ’em, vaping isn’t going anywhere. The FDA’s approval suggests they see some role for Juul in helping smokers quit, even as critics worry about the risks. It’s a messy middle ground in the ongoing debate over harm reduction versus youth addiction.