The Senate is considering scrapping a rule that penalizes automakers for not meeting fuel-efficiency standards—a policy that once pushed the industry toward greener cars like the Prius. Now, car companies are divided: some want the fines gone, while others worry it could stall progress on cleaner vehicles.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about fines—it’s about whether the U.S. keeps pressure on automakers to innovate or lets them off the hook. If the rule disappears, it could slow down the shift to fuel-efficient cars at a time when climate change is screaming for faster action. Not great for the planet, and maybe not even for automakers in the long run.

A UK power station called Drax is burning ancient trees shipped from North America, all while receiving billions in government subsidies meant for green energy. Critics argue this practice is the opposite of sustainable—destroying old forests, creating massive carbon emissions from transport, and misusing public funds meant to fight climate change.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about wasted money—it’s a glaring example of how well-intentioned green policies can backfire spectacularly. If subsidies meant to protect the planet are actually fueling deforestation and pollution, something’s gone horribly wrong. It’s a wake-up call to scrutinize where "green" labels really lead.