Former President Trump is pushing a new immigration bill that would significantly hike fees for legal immigration and funnel a staggering $150 billion into deportation efforts. The proposal aims to beef up law enforcement and detention infrastructure, potentially overhauling how the U.S. handles immigration—making it pricier to come legally and far tougher to stay illegally.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another policy tweak—it’s a massive financial and logistical shift that could make legal immigration a luxury while aggressively ramping up deportations. For immigrants, businesses relying on foreign labor, and advocates, this could mean higher barriers and a more militarized system. Whether you see it as necessary enforcement or overreach, it’s a story that’ll shape lives and elections.

Former President Trump is pushing for a shift in military spending, favoring an increase in drones and missiles while cutting back on the controversial F-35 fighter jet program. The proposed $893 billion budget reflects his preference for cost-effective, high-impact weapons over expensive, high-tech aircraft.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about dollars and cents—it signals a broader debate over how the U.S. should modernize its military. Drones and missiles are cheaper and increasingly pivotal in modern warfare, but critics argue cutting advanced jets like the F-35 could weaken air superiority. It’s a tug-of-war between pragmatism and traditional military dominance.

Even some Republicans are raising eyebrows over the White House's push to slash budgets for public broadcasting and foreign aid. President Trump and his budget chief, Russell Vought, are pushing hard for these cuts, but the move is stirring up a rare moment of bipartisan discomfort—showing that money talks, and not everyone likes what it's saying.

Editor’s Note: Budget fights usually split neatly along party lines, but this time, some GOP lawmakers are breaking ranks. That signals these cuts might be more controversial than usual—especially when programs like public broadcasting (think PBS and NPR) and foreign aid have broad public support. It’s a reminder that even in hyper-partisan times, spending decisions can still scramble the usual alliances.

A group of Republican senators is breaking ranks with former President Trump by opposing his proposed cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. They argue these programs serve US interests abroad and at home, signaling internal GOP tensions over budget priorities.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about dollars—it’s a glimpse into the ongoing tug-of-war within the Republican Party. Some lawmakers are pushing back against the isolationist leanings of Trump’s wing, defending programs they see as vital for diplomacy and public information. It matters because these disagreements could shape future policy battles, especially if budget debates heat up.