Science journalists find ChatGPT is bad at summarizing scientific papers
NegativeTechnology

A recent study reveals that science journalists have found ChatGPT to be ineffective at summarizing scientific papers, often prioritizing simplicity over accuracy. This raises concerns about the reliability of AI-generated content in journalism, especially in fields where precision is crucial. As the use of AI tools becomes more prevalent in newsrooms, understanding their limitations is essential for maintaining the integrity of scientific communication.
— Curated by the World Pulse Now AI Editorial System