The 13+ best anti-Prime Day deals 2025 from Best Buy, Walmart, & more: Top sales from Amazon's competition

A federal judge threw out a lawsuit by authors who claimed Meta illegally used their books to train its AI systems. The ruling favors Meta, suggesting the authors’ copyright claims didn’t hold up in court—at least for now.

Supercell, the Finnish studio behind hit mobile games like Clash Royale and Brawl Stars, is bringing its titles to WeChat as mini games—no downloads required. This move taps into Tencent’s massive WeChat audience in China, where Brawl Stars is already live and Clash Royale is expected to launch in September.

Editor’s Note: For gamers, this means easier access to Supercell’s popular titles without clogging up phone storage. For Tencent, it’s a smart play to keep users engaged within WeChat’s ecosystem. And for Supercell, it’s a big opportunity to grow in China, where WeChat’s billion-plus users are a goldmine. Win-win-win.

The developers behind QEMU, a popular open-source emulator, have decided to ban the use of AI-generated code in their project. This policy stems from concerns over licensing ambiguity, code quality, and potential legal risks—since AI tools often train on copyrighted or unclear sources. The move reflects broader debates in open-source communities about how (or whether) to integrate AI-assisted coding.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about QEMU—it’s a microcosm of the bigger tug-of-war between AI adoption and open-source principles. If even a major project like QEMU is wary of AI-generated code, it signals that legal and ethical uncertainties aren’t going away anytime soon. For developers, it’s a reminder to tread carefully before mixing AI and collaborative coding.

A 25-year-old British hacker operating under the alias "IntelBroker" has been charged by U.S. authorities for allegedly teaming up with cybercriminals to breach multiple companies, steal sensitive data, and sell it online. The breaches reportedly caused over $25 million in damages globally, affecting businesses and potentially exposing customer information.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another cybercrime case—it’s a reminder of how organized hacking groups can wreak havoc on businesses and individuals alike. The scale of the damage ($25 million+) and the international scope make it a big deal, especially as companies struggle to fend off increasingly bold cyberattacks. If you’ve ever wondered why your personal data might end up for sale on the dark web, cases like this show how it happens.

A federal judge ruled in Meta’s favor in a lawsuit over whether its AI systems violated copyright laws, dealing a win for the tech giant—at least for now. However, the judge didn’t shut the door entirely, hinting that future lawsuits on similar grounds could still have a shot.

Editor’s Note: This ruling is a big deal because it’s part of the growing legal tug-of-war over how AI companies use copyrighted material to train their models. Meta dodged a bullet here, but the broader fight isn’t over—this could encourage more lawsuits testing where the line is between innovation and infringement. For now, it’s a cautious green light for AI development, but with plenty of asterisks.