A new AI tool called Codio Coach is making bold claims—it says students can improve their grades by 15% using a learning technique inspired by a 2400-year-old method (likely referencing Socratic questioning or similar classical approaches). But the author isn’t buying it, pointing out that the results might not hold up in real-world classrooms outside Codio’s controlled testing environment. Skeptics argue that without independent verification, the promise of an instant grade boost feels more like marketing hype than proven science.

Editor’s Note: Everyone wants an edge in learning, especially with AI tools flooding the market. But this story highlights a growing tension: flashy claims vs. real-world effectiveness. If AI tools can’t deliver outside a lab setting, students and educators might waste time (and money) on solutions that don’t actually help. It’s a reminder to approach AI-driven education promises with a healthy dose of skepticism—because better grades shouldn’t come from blind trust in algorithms.

Google is expanding access to its AI tool, Gemini, to students under 18, aiming to integrate AI into classrooms worldwide. While the move promises advanced learning tools, it’s also sparking debates about how AI might reshape education—and whether it’s a help or a hurdle for students and teachers.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about another tech rollout—it’s a glimpse into the future of learning. AI like Gemini could personalize education or even lighten teachers’ workloads, but it also brings big questions: Will it deepen inequality? Could it replace critical thinking? The story matters because it’s part of a much larger conversation about how we prepare kids for a world where AI is everywhere.