David Sacks, a top Trump-era adviser and current White House tech policy leader, claims China is getting alarmingly good at bypassing U.S. restrictions on advanced semiconductor exports. He estimates China’s chip design tech is now just two years behind America’s—way closer than many assumed.

Editor’s Note: If Sacks is right, America’s strategy to slow China’s tech rise by cutting off chip access might be leaking like a sieve. This isn’t just about bragging rights—it’s a national security red flag, since cutting-edge chips power everything from AI to missiles. The timeline’s tighter than expected, and that could force Washington to rethink its playbook fast.

President Trump is reportedly giving TikTok yet another lifeline—this would be the third extension for the popular video app as it scrambles to finalize a deal addressing U.S. security concerns. It’s another twist in the months-long saga that’s left users and investors guessing whether TikTok will be banned or sold.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about TikTok—it’s a high-stakes test of how the U.S. handles foreign-owned tech platforms. Every delay keeps millions of creators and businesses in limbo, while also signaling that the administration might be softening its hardline stance (or just kicking the can down the road). Either way, it’s a reminder of how messy regulating global tech can get.

Former President Trump is stirring the pot again by suggesting that China needs to approve any sale of TikTok—and hinting that only he can "save" the app. Meanwhile, the already messy deal keeps getting delayed, leaving everyone wondering what’s really going on behind the scenes.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about TikTok’s fate—it’s another example of how geopolitics and big tech are tangled up in personal agendas. Trump’s comments add fuel to the fire, making a shaky deal even shakier. For users and businesses relying on TikTok, the uncertainty drags on, and for watchers of U.S.-China relations, it’s a reminder of how one app can become a political football.

President Trump's family is promoting a new "all-American" smartphone, the Trump Mobile T1, but supply chain experts are skeptical. Most smartphones—including possibly this one—are made in China, which dominates global production. Analysts are digging into the device's origins to see if the "built in the USA" claim holds up.

Editor’s Note: If the phone isn’t actually made in the U.S., it undercuts Trump’s "America First" branding—and highlights how deeply globalized tech manufacturing really is. For consumers, it’s a reminder to check those "made in" labels a little closer.

The Trump family is launching a $499 smartphone, but details are still hazy. Eric Trump claims the phone will eventually be manufactured in the U.S., but there's no clear timeline or specifics on features, suppliers, or how it stacks up against competitors. Right now, it’s more of a headline than a fully fleshed-out product.

Editor’s Note: A Trump-branded phone is bound to stir curiosity—and skepticism. Given the family’s polarizing reputation, this isn’t just another gadget launch; it’s a political statement wrapped in tech. But without concrete details, it’s hard to tell if this is a serious contender or just a novelty. Either way, it’s a reminder of how deeply politics and commerce can intertwine.

The Trump Organization is touting its new T1 Phone as "built in the United States," but experts are skeptical. Given the global nature of smartphone supply chains—where components like chips and screens are almost entirely sourced overseas—claiming a phone is truly "made in the USA" is a stretch. Analysts suggest it might involve minor final assembly stateside, but the core parts will likely still come from abroad.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just about one phone—it taps into bigger debates about domestic manufacturing, political branding, and whether "made in the USA" claims hold up in today's globalized economy. If a product as complex as a smartphone can't realistically be built entirely in the U.S., it raises questions about how meaningful such labels really are. Plus, with Trump's history of blending business and politics, the claim feels as much about messaging as it does about manufacturing.

President Trump’s latest tax bill proposes hiking investment credits for semiconductor production from 25% to 30%, a move that could spur more domestic chip manufacturing. Meanwhile, autonomous vehicle startup Applied Intuition plans to pour its fresh $600 million funding into expanding self-driving tech, and privacy-focused phone maker Purism is in talks to supply its U.S.-made devices for Trump’s new mobile service.

Editor’s Note: Semiconductors are the backbone of everything from smartphones to military tech, and boosting incentives for U.S. production could reduce reliance on foreign supply chains. The other tidbits—self-driving investments and a potential Trump-Purism deal—hint at how policy shifts and private money are reshaping tech landscapes. It’s a snapshot of how politics, funding, and innovation keep colliding.

The Trump administration's EPA is looking into reversing a long-standing ban on asbestos, a material known to cause cancer. Trump himself has previously defended asbestos use, even suggesting its negative reputation was unfairly influenced by organized crime.

Editor’s Note: Asbestos is linked to serious health risks, including lung disease and cancer, which is why it's been heavily restricted for decades. If the ban is lifted, it could mean a return to broader use in construction and manufacturing—raising major public health concerns. This isn't just about policy; it's about whether the government is prioritizing industry interests over people's safety.