Thames Water's future in doubt after investor pulls out

After a rocky period that included a lockout last year, British Columbia’s maritime employers and the union for port supervisors have finally agreed to a new four-year contract. Both sides voted to approve the deal, bringing stability back to the ports after last year’s disruptions.

Editor’s Note: This agreement is a big deal because it avoids another potential standoff that could’ve snarled shipments and hurt the economy. Ports are crucial for trade, and labor peace means fewer headaches for businesses relying on smooth operations. It’s also a win for workers who now have long-term security—something that matters in an industry where labor disputes can flare up fast.

A former cadet is suing Vernon Cadet Camp, alleging they were physically and sexually assaulted by a leader back in 2007. The plaintiff, referred to only as G.A.C., filed court documents last week detailing the claims—another troubling case in a string of historical abuse allegations within youth programs.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about one incident from 17 years ago—it’s part of a larger reckoning with how institutions handle abuse claims, especially involving minors. If proven, it could signal systemic failures in oversight at cadet programs, adding pressure for accountability and reforms. For survivors, cases like this often validate long-held pain while testing whether justice moves faster than silence.

The U.S. government is scaling back how much price data it collects on everyday items like groceries, claiming the changes won’t make much difference. But economists are worried this could weaken trust in inflation numbers, especially since the system tracking these prices is already under strain.

Editor’s Note: Inflation data affects everything from interest rates to your grocery bill—so if the numbers become less reliable, it could make it harder to gauge the real state of the economy. Less data might mean more guesswork for policymakers and more uncertainty for everyone else.

A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated the rights of several migrants by deporting them without due process under the Alien Enemies Act. The judge, James E. Boasberg, didn’t mince words—he likened their treatment to something out of a Kafka novel, suggesting they were essentially railroaded with no chance to fight their removals. The court also hinted these men have a strong case if they pursue legal action.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about a few deportations—it’s a big deal because it challenges how far the government can go in fast-tracking removals without basic legal safeguards. If the ruling holds, it could force changes in how immigration enforcement handles due process, especially under obscure laws like the Alien Enemies Act. Plus, comparing it to Kafka? That’s a judicial mic drop.

Denmark's left-leaning government, led by the Social Democrats, is turning heads with its surprisingly strict immigration policies—something more commonly associated with far-right parties. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen is pushing measures like limiting asylum claims and deporting rejected applicants, a stance that’s sparking debate both at home and abroad.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Denmark—it’s a sign of how immigration debates are shifting across Europe. When a traditionally progressive party adopts hardline policies, it challenges assumptions about left vs. right politics and raises questions about how countries balance openness with control. It’s a story that could influence how other governments approach immigration in the future.