Former President Donald Trump has publicly acknowledged an attempt to deport migrants to South Sudan during his administration, though details remain unclear. The move appears to align with his hardline immigration policies, but the feasibility and legal implications of such deportations raise questions.

Editor’s Note: This story sheds light on the aggressive—and often controversial—measures taken during Trump's presidency to curb immigration. South Sudan, a country still grappling with instability, isn’t a typical destination for deportations, which makes this revelation notable. It’s a reminder of how immigration policy can have real-world consequences for vulnerable populations, and it’ll likely fuel ongoing debates about the ethics and logistics of deportation strategies.

Harvard University is reeling after the U.S. government announced that international students on visas must leave the country if their classes move entirely online this fall. The abrupt policy shift throws thousands of students into uncertainty, forcing schools to scramble for hybrid solutions or risk losing their global talent. Critics call it cruel and counterproductive, while supporters argue it prioritizes in-person education.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about paperwork—it’s about real people’s lives. International students contribute billions to the U.S. economy and enrich campuses culturally and academically. Kicking them out mid-pandemic feels like punching down, and it puts universities in an impossible bind: reopen unsafely or lose vital students. The move could also signal broader hostility toward immigration, which has ripple effects far beyond academia.

The Trump administration is rolling out a new policy that would impose billions in fines on undocumented immigrants as part of a broader push to pressure them into leaving the U.S. voluntarily. Alongside existing measures like offering free flights and cash stipends, these hefty financial penalties aim to make life so difficult that migrants choose to "self-deport."

Editor’s Note: This isn't just another headline—it's a major escalation in the administration's hardline approach to immigration. Fining undocumented immigrants billions collectively could have ripple effects, from deepening fear in migrant communities to sparking legal challenges. Whether you see it as tough enforcement or undue cruelty, it’s a policy that could reshape lives and the political debate around immigration.

Harvard is pushing back against a sudden move by the Trump administration that strips the university of its right to enroll international students. The policy forces thousands of affected students to either scramble for transfers or face deportation—a move Harvard calls "unlawful" and harmful to both education and the U.S.'s global academic standing.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just about Harvard—it's a ripple effect. International students contribute billions to the U.S. economy and enrich campuses culturally and academically. Kicking them out mid-education disrupts lives, hurts universities financially, and sends a chilling message to global talent about America's openness. It also sets up a legal battle that could redefine how immigration policies intersect with higher ed.