Naveen Kumar, whose brother Ajith Kumar died in police custody in Tamil Nadu’s Sivaganga district, has now been hospitalized himself after allegedly being beaten by police. Ajith’s postmortem showed signs of injuries and possible torture, sparking outrage. The state government has offered compensation, and Chief Minister MK Stalin has called for a CBI probe—five officers are already arrested. Meanwhile, actor Vijay visited the grieving family, drawing more attention to the case.

Editor’s Note: Custodial deaths and police violence remain a grim reality in India, and this case—with its high-profile scrutiny—highlights systemic issues in law enforcement. The involvement of a celebrity and a CBI investigation suggests public pressure is mounting, but for the victim’s family, justice is still a long road ahead. Stories like this force us to confront how power can be abused, even by those meant to protect us.

The Supreme Court just handed down a major ruling against porn platforms, dealing a blow to an industry long criticized for exploitative practices. While the details aren't spelled out here, the tone suggests this is a watershed moment—like watching a notorious bully finally get taken down a peg.

Editor’s Note: Love it or hate it, the adult content industry drives huge swaths of internet traffic—and controversy. A Supreme Court decision against it could ripple across content moderation, free speech debates, and even payment processing. This isn’t just about morality; it’s about who controls the wild west of online spaces.

The Supreme Court has asked the government to take back the official residence of former Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, saying he’s overstayed the allowed time. It’s a straightforward nudge to enforce rules, but it’s bound to raise eyebrows given Chandrachud’s stature.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about a housing dispute—it’s a test of how rules apply to top officials. If even a former CJI is being asked to vacate, it signals that no one’s above protocol. But it also begs the question: Why now, and could there be more to it?

A civil society group called ADR is sounding the alarm over a recent voter list cleanup in Bihar, claiming it could strip voting rights from hundreds of thousands—especially poorer and marginalized folks. They’ve taken the fight to India’s top court, arguing the Election Commission’s strict paperwork rules (like rejecting Aadhaar or ration cards as ID) unfairly lock out vulnerable communities.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just bureaucratic red tape—it’s about who gets a say in democracy. If ADR’s claims hold up, entire communities could be silenced in future elections, skewing representation. It’s a high-stakes clash between election integrity and access, with Bihar’s political balance potentially on the line.

In a major reversal, the Jammu & Kashmir High Court has acquitted Maan Chand, who was serving a life sentence for his wife’s 2012 murder. The court slammed the investigation, pointing out glaring holes—like mismatched weapon evidence, shoddy autopsy work, and timeline gaps. The judges also noted there was no proof backing claims of infidelity, and investigators oddly ignored the fact that the couple’s son had suffered burns around the same time. Basically, the case fell apart under scrutiny.

The Delhi High Court just shut down 300 appeals from the defence ministry that tried to block disability pensions for soldiers. The court stood firm—these pensions aren’t charity; they’re a basic recognition of the toll military service takes, whether soldiers were on the frontlines or not.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just bureaucratic wrangling—it’s about fairness for veterans. The ruling reinforces that injuries or disabilities from service deserve support, full stop. For soldiers, it’s a win that could ease financial strain and acknowledge sacrifices that don’t always happen in combat zones. For the ministry, it’s a reminder that red tape shouldn’t outweigh duty of care.