In a surprising shift of tone, former US President Donald Trump openly criticized Vladimir Putin, calling the Russian leader "crazy" following a massive wave of attacks on Ukraine. Trump, who has often avoided direct condemnation of Putin, stated he was "not happy" with the escalation—a rare moment of public disapproval from a figure known for his ambiguous stance on Russia.

Editor’s Note: Trump’s comments are noteworthy because they break from his usual reluctance to confront Putin, especially during a conflict that’s strained global alliances. Whether this signals a real shift in his posture or just situational rhetoric, it adds another layer to the complex dynamics between the US, Russia, and the ongoing war in Ukraine. For observers, it’s a reminder of how volatile political relationships can be—even between leaders who’ve often seemed aligned.

Russia has unleashed a large-scale aerial attack on Ukraine, targeting multiple locations with missiles and drones. Footage of the assault shows explosions and smoke rising over urban areas, underscoring the intensity of the strikes. Ukrainian officials report casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure, while air defenses scramble to intercept incoming threats.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just another headline—it's a brutal escalation in a war that's already dragged on for years. Civilians are once again bearing the brunt, and the sheer scale of the attack suggests Russia isn't backing down. For global observers, it’s a grim reminder that diplomacy has failed to stop the bloodshed, and the humanitarian toll keeps climbing.

Former President Donald Trump made headlines by calling Russian President Vladimir Putin "crazy" and warning that Russia’s ongoing aggression in Ukraine could lead to its own collapse. In the same breath, Trump also took shots at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, adding another layer to his controversial stance on the war.

Editor’s Note: Trump’s comments are significant because they reflect his unpredictable approach to foreign policy—simultaneously condemning Putin while undermining Ukraine’s leader. With the 2024 election looming, his remarks could influence debates over America’s role in the war and its broader geopolitical stance. It’s a reminder that Trump’s words still carry weight, whether you agree with them or not.

Former President Donald Trump weighed in on Russia's recent strikes against military targets in Kyiv, calling Putin's actions irrational and claiming Moscow attacked Ukraine "for no reason." The remarks add to Trump's history of controversial statements about the Ukraine conflict and Putin's motives.

Editor’s Note: Trump's comments are likely to stir debate—both for their blunt criticism of Putin and their oversimplification of the war's causes. Given Trump's influence in U.S. politics, his take could shape conservative perspectives on the conflict, even as it draws skepticism from foreign policy experts who see Russia's aggression as calculated, not impulsive.

In a rare public criticism, former U.S. President Donald Trump called out Russian leader Vladimir Putin for escalating attacks in Ukraine, labeling the move "absolutely crazy." Trump, who has often been accused of being soft on Putin, took a sharper tone here, though his exact motivations or policy stance remain unclear.

Editor’s Note: Trump’s remarks are noteworthy because he’s historically avoided direct condemnation of Putin, even during his presidency. This shift—whether political strategy or genuine criticism—could signal changing dynamics in how U.S. leaders, present and future, approach Russia’s war in Ukraine. For voters and foreign allies, it’s a moment to watch: will this rhetoric stick, or is it just temporary posturing?

A Russian military commander has alleged that President Vladimir Putin’s helicopter was dangerously close to a Ukrainian drone strike during his visit to Kursk Oblast on May 20. Yury Dashkin claimed Putin’s aircraft was "at the epicenter" of the attack, which Russian forces reportedly repelled. This marks Putin’s first publicly acknowledged trip to the region since Russia retook control in March 2025—raising questions about security risks and Ukraine’s ability to target high-profile figures.

Editor’s Note: If true, this incident suggests Ukraine’s drone capabilities are sharp enough to threaten even Putin’s movements—a bold statement in a war where symbolism matters as much as territory. For Russia, it’s an embarrassing security lapse; for Ukraine, it’s a morale boost. Either way, it underscores how volatile the frontline remains, even during what should be tightly controlled visits.

Former President Donald Trump lashed out at Vladimir Putin after Russia launched deadly attacks across Ukraine, questioning the Russian leader's actions with a blunt, "What the hell happened to him?" Trump also floated the idea of additional sanctions against Russia, marking a rare moment of direct criticism toward Putin from the typically Russia-friendly ex-president.

Editor’s Note: Trump’s sharp words stand out because he’s often avoided condemning Putin, even during the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. His shift in tone—whether political posturing or a genuine reaction—could signal tension in their long-standing, controversial rapport. For Ukraine, any U.S. pressure on Russia matters, but critics will be watching to see if Trump’s rhetoric translates into policy if he returns to power.

Former President Donald Trump publicly expressed dissatisfaction with Russian President Vladimir Putin following a massive Russian aerial assault on Ukraine, which targeted cities like Kyiv and left at least 12 dead. Trump’s remarks came in response to what’s being called the largest drone and missile attack of the war so far.

Editor’s Note: Trump’s criticism of Putin is notable given his history of avoiding direct condemnation of Russia’s actions in Ukraine. The timing—amid a brutal escalation—adds weight to his words, but it also raises questions about how this might play into broader political dynamics, especially as Trump eyes another presidential run. For Ukraine, the attack underscores the grim reality of the war’s intensification, with civilians paying the price.