In a surprising turn of events, two jurors from Harvey Weinstein's trial in New York City have come forward, claiming they were pressured by fellow jurors to vote for a conviction. This revelation raises serious questions about the integrity of the jury process and the fairness of the trial. The jurors expressed regret over their decision, highlighting the potential for coercion in high-profile cases. This situation not only impacts Weinstein's legal standing but also sheds light on the broader issues of juror influence and the justice system.

Two jurors from Harvey Weinstein's trial have come forward, claiming they were pressured into voting for his conviction due to bullying from other panel members. This revelation, shared by Weinstein's lawyers in a recent court filing, raises serious questions about the integrity of the jury's decision-making process. It highlights the potential for coercion in high-profile cases and could have significant implications for Weinstein's legal battles moving forward.