Officer who used excessive force allowed to plead guilty to misdemeanor after felony conviction

President Trump weighed in on the controversial return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a man accused of being an undocumented immigrant and gang member—to the U.S., vowing that the legal system would expose his alleged crimes. Trump’s remarks framed the situation as a failure of immigration enforcement, suggesting Garcia’s case exemplifies broader concerns.

Editor’s Note: This story taps into the heated debate over immigration policy and border security, a recurring flashpoint in U.S. politics. Trump’s reaction keeps the spotlight on his hardline stance, while critics might see it as another example of politicizing individual cases. Either way, it’s fuel for an already fiery discussion.

College students are increasingly turning to "no contact orders" (NCOs) to avoid dealing with interpersonal conflicts—far beyond their original purpose of protecting survivors of sexual assault. These orders, which legally restrict contact between individuals, are now being used for everything from petty roommate squabbles to awkward ex encounters. Critics argue it’s a sign of a generation that’d rather bureaucratize discomfort than hash things out directly.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about students dodging drama—it’s a window into how younger generations handle conflict (or avoid it altogether). If NCOs become the default for minor disputes, it could strain campus resources meant for serious cases and leave students unequipped to navigate real-world tensions. Plus, it raises questions: Are we institutionalizing avoidance, or is this just smart boundary-setting in a digital age? Either way, it’s changing how campuses deal with friction.

Some of the country’s wealthiest universities, like Harvard and Stanford, are trying to avoid a major tax increase proposed in President Trump’s bill by offering a deal: they’ll spend billions more from their massive endowments if Congress agrees to lower their tax rates. Essentially, they’re negotiating to keep more of their money while promising to put more of it toward education or other institutional needs.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about rich schools trying to save money—it’s a high-stakes tug-of-war over how universities use their massive endowments. Critics argue these funds should be spent more freely to lower tuition or expand access, while universities say they need financial flexibility for long-term stability. The outcome could set a precedent for how endowments are taxed and managed nationwide, affecting everything from student costs to research funding.

The White House is touting a major win for Trump's immigration policies this week, calling it a "blockbuster" success. In a bold statement, officials framed it as a victory for Americans while taking a hard line against undocumented immigrants—declaring it a "bad day" for them.

Editor’s Note: This story highlights the administration's aggressive stance on immigration, signaling tighter enforcement and political momentum ahead. For supporters, it’s a promise kept; for critics, it’s another divisive move in a long-running debate over border security and immigrant rights. Either way, it’s a flashpoint in the broader national conversation.

Federal immigration agents, dressed in masks, carried out coordinated raids across Los Angeles on Friday, targeting locations like Home Depot stores and a clothing manufacturer’s headquarters. The operations sparked protests, with clashes leaving some demonstrators injured and around two dozen people detained. Videos circulating online show agents forcibly removing individuals, heightening tensions in the city.

Editor’s Note: These raids are part of ongoing debates over immigration policy and enforcement tactics, which often stir strong reactions. For LA’s immigrant communities, such actions can fuel fear and distrust, while advocates argue they reflect necessary law enforcement. The protests and injuries add another layer, showing how volatile these operations can become when they play out in public view. It’s a story about power, resistance, and the human impact of policy decisions.