Feds move to drop charges in controversial cases as Trump re-ups L.A. prosecutor

President Trump has pushed back the deadline for a trade deal with Mexico by 90 days after talks with the Mexican president, but tensions with Canada are heating up. Trump warned that Canada’s plan to recognize Palestine could complicate trade negotiations, leaving businesses and markets on edge as the tariff standoff continues.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about deadlines—it’s about uncertainty. The extension gives Mexico breathing room, but Trump’s hardline stance on Canada suggests more turbulence ahead for North American trade. For businesses relying on cross-border supply chains, the rollercoaster of tariffs and threats means planning gets harder, and costs could keep rising.

President Trump has extended the deadline for a trade deal with Mexico by 90 days, despite previously insisting that August 1 was a hard cutoff for global trade negotiations. He acknowledged that Mexico's situation is more complicated than other countries', hinting at ongoing talks behind the scenes.

Editor’s Note: This move suggests that while Trump is sticking to his tough-on-trade stance, he’s also willing to bend when practical realities—like Mexico’s unique economic ties with the U.S.—come into play. It’s a small but telling shift, showing that even hard deadlines can soften when deals are still in the works. For businesses and markets, it’s a temporary sigh of relief, but the longer-term uncertainty remains.

President Trump has pushed back his deadline for imposing global tariffs by another 90 days following what he called a "very successful" call with Mexico's new president, Claudia Sheinbaum. The extension keeps existing tariffs in place for now but buys more time for negotiations.

Editor’s Note: This is another twist in the ongoing saga of Trump's trade strategy—delaying big decisions while keeping pressure on. For businesses and consumers, it means tariffs aren't going away yet, but the extra negotiating window could signal either progress or just kicking the can down the road. Either way, it’s a temporary reprieve with uncertain long-term consequences.

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro made headlines by suggesting President Trump should be considered for the Nobel Prize in economics. Navarro praised Trump’s aggressive trade policies, claiming they’ve reshaped global trade dynamics and "taught the world trade economics." The remark, made during an interview, frames Trump’s approach as groundbreaking—though it’s sure to spark debate among economists and political opponents.

Editor’s Note: Navarro’s comment isn’t just a pat on the back—it’s a political statement meant to reframe Trump’s trade wars as visionary rather than chaotic. Whether you agree or not, it highlights how the administration wants its economic legacy remembered. For critics, it’s a stretch; for supporters, it’s validation. Either way, it keeps the conversation about Trump’s policies alive in an election year.

The group overseeing payments for college athletes just made it easier for third-party organizations (called "collectives") to strike name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals with players. Instead of tight restrictions, these collectives now just need to show they have a "valid business purpose." This avoids another legal battle over how athletes can profit from their fame while keeping some guardrails in place.

Editor’s Note: College athlete pay rules are still messy, but this tweak lets more money flow without dragging everyone back to court. It’s a small step toward normalizing NIL deals—good for players who want to cash in, but critics might worry it opens the door for shady deals disguised as "business purposes." Either way, the fight over fairness in college sports isn’t over.