Justice Department ends ‘baseless’ probe into Trump border czar Tom Homan over alleged $50K bribe in Cava restaurant bag

In a significant move, President Trump has signed an executive order designating Antifa as a 'domestic terrorist organization.' This decision follows his previous hints about labeling the radical anti-fascist group as a terror entity. The implications of this order are profound, as it could lead to increased scrutiny and potential legal actions against individuals associated with Antifa, raising concerns about civil liberties and the government's approach to dissent.

Donald Trump has signed an executive order designating antifa as a 'domestic terrorist organization,' a move that revives a controversial stance from his previous presidency. This decision comes in the wake of the tragic killing of Charlie Kirk, raising concerns about the implications for civil liberties and political discourse in the U.S. By labeling antifa in this way, Trump is intensifying the national debate on extremism and the government's response to it, which could have significant repercussions for how protests and dissent are managed.

In several states, Democrats have been hesitant to pursue mid-decade redistricting, a strategy that could counteract Republican efforts led by President Trump. While California has taken steps in this direction, other Democratic-led states have been slower to act. This situation is significant as it highlights the differing approaches to redistricting and the potential impact on future elections.

President Trump's recent actions have raised concerns as he intensifies his pressure on Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute his political rivals. This move is seen as an alarming escalation in the politicization of the Justice Department, particularly after he dismissed a U.S. attorney who refused to pursue charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James. This situation matters because it highlights the potential misuse of power in the legal system, which could undermine public trust in justice and fairness.

Jimmy Kimmel is set to return to the air on Tuesday night, and many are hoping he will use his platform to humorously critique Donald Trump. This return is seen as important for democracy, as comedians play a vital role in holding public figures accountable through satire. Kimmel's sharp wit could provide a much-needed perspective during these politically charged times.

President Trump has stirred controversy by claiming that acetaminophen, commonly known as Tylenol, increases the risk of autism when taken by pregnant women. This assertion contradicts existing research and has sparked significant debate. The Trump administration's recent conclusions about autism's causes and their push for a potential 'cure' raise concerns about the validity of their findings and the implications for public health. This matter is crucial as it affects perceptions of autism and could influence future research and healthcare policies.

The recent deal involving TikTok and Oracle marks a significant step forward for the popular social media platform in the United States. With Oracle set to provide security for TikTok's operations, this agreement not only ensures the app's continued presence in the U.S. but also addresses concerns over data privacy and security. This development is crucial as it highlights the ongoing efforts to balance national security interests with the demand for popular digital platforms, making it a noteworthy moment in the tech landscape.

President Trump is set to meet with Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries this week as the threat of a government shutdown looms. This meeting is significant as it could pave the way for bipartisan discussions and potential solutions to avoid a shutdown, impacting millions of Americans who rely on government services.

The Supreme Court is set to revisit the boundaries of presidential authority regarding the dismissal of high-ranking officials. Recently, the justices permitted President Trump to remove the last Democratic commissioner from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This decision is significant as it could reshape the balance of power between the presidency and independent regulatory agencies, impacting how future administrations manage their appointments and the oversight of federal agencies.

President Trump has made a significant announcement urging pregnant women to avoid taking Tylenol throughout their pregnancy, citing studies that link the painkiller to an increased risk of autism in children. This statement raises concerns about the safety of widely used medications during pregnancy and highlights the need for further research and awareness on the potential risks associated with common drugs.

In a recent discussion, NBC News' Erika Edwards and Dr. Kavita Patel addressed President Trump's claims linking acetaminophen use during pregnancy to autism. Major medical organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, emphasize that acetaminophen is one of the safest pain relievers for pregnant women, and research has not substantiated any connection between its use and developmental issues in children. This conversation is crucial as it highlights the importance of relying on scientific evidence in public health discussions.

The Trump administration's recent proposal to narrow the scope of safety reviews for existing chemicals has raised concerns among environmentalists and public health advocates. By limiting the assessment criteria, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may overlook potential risks associated with these chemicals, which could have serious implications for public health and safety. This move is seen as a step back in regulatory oversight, prompting fears about the long-term effects on the environment and consumer safety.

Martha Harrison, a lawyer, recently shared insights on the significant challenges faced by businesses due to Donald Trump's tariffs over the past eight months. She highlighted how these tariffs have dramatically impacted their client base, creating a volatile environment in international trade. This situation matters because it underscores the broader implications of trade policies on economic stability and business operations.

In a recent discussion among NY Post readers, New York Democratic Chairman Jay Jacobs has taken a bold stance against mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani. This opposition highlights the ongoing debates within the party and reflects the diverse opinions shaping the upcoming election. Jacobs' willingness to voice his concerns is significant as it underscores the importance of leadership and accountability in political nominations, making it a topic of interest for voters.

The Supreme Court has decided to review a longstanding precedent that allows Congress to grant certain agencies independence from the executive branch. This move could significantly impact the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and other agencies, as it challenges the balance of power between Congress and the White House. The outcome of this case is crucial as it may redefine the operational autonomy of federal agencies, influencing how they function and enforce regulations in the future.

Yinye Wang and Quiju Wu have been charged with stealing $3 million from a missing couple from Long Island, but only Wu appeared in federal court. This case highlights the troubling issue of theft and deception, especially when it involves vulnerable individuals. The absence of Wang raises questions about accountability and the ongoing investigation into the couple's disappearance.

In a significant move, President Trump has signed an executive order designating Antifa as a 'domestic terrorist organization.' This decision follows his previous hints about labeling the radical anti-fascist group as a terror entity. The implications of this order are profound, as it could lead to increased scrutiny and potential legal actions against individuals associated with Antifa, raising concerns about civil liberties and the government's approach to dissent.

The recent recognition of 'Palestine' has sparked outrage as it is seen as a reward for Hamas, which continues to taunt the international community. This move not only undermines the plight of Israeli hostages but also raises concerns about the implications for peace in the region. It's a contentious issue that highlights the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the challenges of achieving a lasting resolution.