Sentencing hearing set for ex-Kentucky officer convicted in Breonna Taylor raid

The White House is catching heat after excluding The Wall Street Journal from the press pool covering Trump’s Scotland trip—a move press freedom advocates call retaliation for critical coverage. The White House Correspondents' Association slammed the decision as a First Amendment red flag, signaling a worrying pattern of sidelining unfriendly media.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about one outlet missing a trip—it’s another flashpoint in the tense relationship between the Trump administration and the press. Blocking access based on coverage sets a dangerous precedent, and journalists are pushing back hard. If governments pick and choose who gets to report, it chips away at accountability. That’s a big deal for everyone who cares about transparency.

The Trump administration is ramping up immigration enforcement in so-called "sanctuary cities," with border czar Tom Homan pledging to intensify ICE operations there. This comes after an off-duty police officer in NYC was allegedly shot by an undocumented immigrant with a prior criminal record—an incident the administration is using to justify its crackdown on cities that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

General Motors is feeling the pinch from Trump-era tariffs, reporting a hefty $1.1 billion blow so far—and warning investors it’s going to get worse next quarter. The auto giant, which sells more cars in the U.S. than any other manufacturer, is bracing for even steeper costs as these import taxes ripple through its supply chain.

Editor’s Note: Tariffs might sound like distant economic policy, but this shows how they directly slam big companies—and could eventually trickle down to car buyers through higher prices or squeezed profits. GM’s warning is a red flag for industries tangled in global trade fights, especially as election-year politics keep tariffs in the spotlight.

Coca-Cola is rolling out a cane sugar version of its soda in the U.S. this fall, a move that comes after former President Trump publicly pushed for the company to bring back "real sugar" drinks. The CEO acknowledged Trump’s influence in a recent investor call, though it’s unclear if the timing is purely coincidental or a direct response.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about soda—it’s a quirky example of how political figures can sway corporate decisions, even in something as everyday as soft drinks. Whether you care about sugar content or not, it’s a reminder that consumer brands sometimes navigate weird intersections of politics, nostalgia, and market demand.

A Brazilian Supreme Court judge has frozen the assets and bank accounts of Eduardo Bolsonaro, the son of far-right ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, amid suspicions he used funds to lobby Donald Trump on his father’s behalf. The move escalates a political showdown between Brazil’s current government and Bolsonaro allies, with the former president himself facing arrest for violating a social media ban. Meanwhile, Trump’s trade policies—once cheered by Bolsonaro—now seem to be hurting the very industries they were meant to protect.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about frozen assets—it’s a messy collision of political power, backroom deals, and unintended consequences. The Bolsonaro family’s legal troubles highlight Brazil’s struggle to hold leaders accountable, while Trump’s tariffs (which Bolsonaro embraced) are now biting Brazil’s economy. For Brazilians, it’s another chapter in the fallout from a divisive era; for the U.S., it’s a reminder that trade wars often backfire. Either way, the drama’s far from over.