Senate passes $9 billion in spending cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid requested by Trump

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) says a third former Biden White House aide, Annie Tomasini, has declined to testify before the panel, calling it "unbelievable." The refusal adds to growing GOP frustration over what they see as stonewalling in their investigations into the Biden administration.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just about one aide—it's part of a broader tug-of-war between House Republicans and the Biden administration over transparency and oversight. Every refusal to cooperate fuels partisan tensions and could escalate calls for more aggressive tactics, like subpoenas or contempt charges. For voters, it reinforces the narrative of a divided Washington where accountability often takes a backseat to political games.

Liberal figures, journalists, and celebrities are expressing disappointment over CBS's decision to cancel The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, a program known for its left-leaning commentary. While CBS insists the move was financially motivated and not politically driven, critics suspect otherwise, given Colbert’s vocal critiques of conservative politics.

Editor’s Note: Colbert’s show wasn’t just another late-night gig—it was a cultural and political touchstone for many progressives. Its cancellation raises questions about whether networks are shying away from divisive voices, even if CBS claims it’s just about the bottom line. For fans, it’s one less platform for sharp, liberal-leaning satire in a media landscape that’s already polarized.

House Republicans are rolling out digital ads linking vulnerable New York and New Jersey Democrats to Zohran Mamdani, NYC’s progressive mayoral nominee. The NRCC’s campaign aims to paint these lawmakers—including Reps. Gillen, Suozzi, and Riley—as aligned with Mamdani’s left-wing policies, likely hoping to sway moderate voters in tight races.

Editor’s Note: This is classic midterm strategy—tie opponents to polarizing figures to exploit voter skepticism. With control of Congress on the line, Republicans are betting that tying swing-seat Democrats to a progressive NYC outsider will resonate in suburbs. It’s a sign of how local races are increasingly nationalized, and why even obscure associations can become attack-ad fodder.

The Wall Street Journal has obtained a 2003 letter allegedly signed by Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, which includes suggestive content—reportedly featuring typed text framed by the outline of a nude woman. Trump is now threatening legal action over the report, though the letter’s authenticity hasn’t been independently verified.

Editor’s Note: This story adds fuel to the long-standing scrutiny over Trump’s ties to Epstein, the disgraced financier accused of sex trafficking. While the letter itself may seem like a relic from the past, it’s politically explosive—especially as Trump campaigns for another term. It raises questions about judgment, associations, and how much this could sway public opinion. For critics, it’s another red flag; for supporters, it’s just another "hit piece." Either way, it’s not going away quietly.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is lashing out at a federal judge in Washington for releasing a transgender migrant from detention, claiming the decision was influenced by "activist pressure" and radical ideology. The agency frames the move as politically motivated rather than based on legal merit, escalating tensions between the Biden administration and conservative critics over immigration and gender policies.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just a legal spat—it’s a flashpoint in the broader culture war over immigration and transgender rights. DHS’s sharp criticism of a judge signals how deeply politicized these issues have become, with each side accusing the other of overreach. For readers, it’s a sign of how heated debates over detention policies and identity are shaping real-world decisions—and who gets caught in the middle.