Fed governor Lisa Cook urged the Supreme Court to allow her to stay on the central bank’s board while her lawsuit over President Trump’s attempt to fire her proceeds

AstraZeneca is taking a significant step by asking the Supreme Court to review its lawsuit against the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program established by the Inflation Reduction Act. This case, filed on September 19, raises important questions about the implications of the IRA for pharmaceutical manufacturers. The outcome could have far-reaching effects on how drug prices are negotiated and the overall landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, making it a crucial issue for both companies and consumers.

The recent discussions surrounding the Supreme Court and Trump's firing power highlight the ongoing debate about the extent of executive authority and the role of federal agencies. This matters because it raises questions about accountability and the balance of power within the government, which can significantly impact how policies are implemented and how public servants operate.

Colorado's largest utility company has reached a significant settlement of approximately $640 million regarding its liability for the devastating Marshall fire of 2021. This agreement not only provides financial relief to those affected by the wildfire but also highlights the importance of corporate accountability in preventing future disasters. It marks a crucial step towards recovery for the community and sets a precedent for how utility companies manage their responsibilities.

Suffolk County has agreed to pay a $9 million settlement to the mother of Thomas Valva, an 8-year-old autistic boy who tragically died after being left in a freezing garage by his ex-NYPD father. This settlement comes after a lengthy $200 million lawsuit, highlighting the systemic failures that led to this heartbreaking incident. It serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for better protections for vulnerable children and accountability for those in positions of authority.

Lisa Cook, a Federal Reserve governor, is urging the US Supreme Court to reject Donald Trump's attempt to remove her from the board. Her lawyers argue that this unprecedented action would undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve and potentially disrupt financial markets. This case is significant as it raises important questions about the balance of power between the presidency and independent financial institutions, which play a crucial role in the economy.

A group linked to Donald Trump has criticized California's Attorney General Robert Bonta for what they call 'ruthless lawfare' in the ongoing transgender sports lawsuit. Recent public records reveal that Bonta's office may not have the legal standing to pursue the case against Trump's order, raising questions about the validity of the lawsuit. This situation is significant as it highlights the contentious legal battles surrounding transgender rights in sports and the implications for future legislation.

In a significant move to uphold the Federal Reserve's independence, former economic leaders Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Janet Yellen have urged the Supreme Court to allow Lisa Cook to continue her role as a governor. This appeal highlights the importance of maintaining a nonpartisan central bank, which is crucial for effective economic policy and stability. The outcome could set a precedent for the future of the Fed and its governance.

Bruce Springsteen has voiced his concerns about the Democratic Party's effectiveness in countering President Trump, highlighting issues with their communication and outreach strategies. He emphasizes the urgent need for a viable alternative party or a leader within the Democrats who can resonate with the majority. This critique matters as it reflects a growing frustration among voters who feel unrepresented and signals a potential shift in political dynamics as the next elections approach.

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett clarified her position on Thursday, stating that she does not consider herself a 'swing justice.' This remark is significant as it challenges the perception that she might frequently change her stance on key issues, which could influence public trust in the court's decisions. By distancing herself from this label, Barrett aims to assert her judicial independence and consistency, which is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the Supreme Court.

A group of former economic leaders has come together to support Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, urging the Supreme Court to allow her to keep her position while legal proceedings determine the legitimacy of her firing by President Trump. This case is significant as it touches on the independence of the Federal Reserve and the implications of political influence on economic governance.

A significant coalition of former U.S. economic leaders is advocating for Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve board, to remain in her position amidst concerns about potential dismissal by Trump. This appeal to the Supreme Court highlights the importance of stability in the central bank's leadership, especially during uncertain economic times. The backing from such influential figures underscores Cook's vital role in shaping monetary policy and maintaining public confidence in the Federal Reserve.

Amazon has reached a significant settlement of $2.5 billion to resolve allegations from federal regulators that it misled customers into subscribing to its Prime service, making it difficult to cancel. This decision is crucial as it not only provides financial restitution to affected shoppers but also sets a precedent for how companies should handle subscription services, ensuring transparency and fairness in the marketplace.

Tonight's 'Thursday Night Football' features an exciting NFC West matchup between the Arizona Cardinals and the Seattle Seahawks, streaming live on Amazon. This game is significant as it showcases two competitive teams vying for playoff positioning, making it a must-watch for football fans.

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of obstruction and making false statements, marking a significant moment in the ongoing tensions between him and the White House. This indictment comes shortly after President Trump publicly called for Comey's prosecution, highlighting the political ramifications of the legal proceedings. The case underscores the principle that no one is above the law, a sentiment echoed by legal experts and political analysts alike.

James Comey has been indicted on charges of making false statements, a move that follows pressure from former President Trump on the attorney general to pursue the case. This development raises significant concerns about the politicization of the justice system and the implications it may have for future legal proceedings involving high-profile figures.

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly lying to Congress and obstructing justice. This development is significant as it raises serious questions about accountability and transparency in government, particularly regarding the actions of high-ranking officials. The implications of this indictment could have far-reaching effects on public trust in law enforcement and the judicial system.

The looming government shutdown is causing significant concern as Republicans and Democrats remain entrenched in their opposing positions. Republicans are advocating for a short-term deal to keep the government operational, while Democrats are pushing for essential healthcare funding. This standoff not only threatens federal services but also raises the stakes with the White House hinting at potential layoffs, which could impact many workers. It's a critical moment that highlights the deep divisions in Congress and the potential consequences for everyday Americans.

In a shocking incident, a 99-year-old landlord in NYC was targeted by a cunning gunman who stole $20,000 in a brazen daylight heist. The thief called the elderly man, claiming to have a package for delivery, showcasing a disturbing trend of criminals preying on vulnerable individuals. This incident raises concerns about safety in urban areas and the need for increased vigilance among the elderly.