Comey prosecutor bashes judge for claiming the indictment was mishandled

The Washington TimesThursday, November 20, 2025 at 10:13:37 PM
NegativeU.S News
Comey prosecutor bashes judge for claiming the indictment was mishandled
  • U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan publicly criticized a federal judge who questioned the handling of the indictment against former FBI Director James Comey, highlighting tensions in the ongoing legal proceedings.
  • This development is significant as it raises questions about the integrity of the prosecution's case and the judicial process, potentially impacting the outcome of the charges against Comey.
  • The situation reflects broader concerns regarding prosecutorial conduct and judicial oversight, as multiple judges have criticized the Justice Department's approach in this high
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended Readings
Justice Department reverses course, now says full grand jury reviewed James Comey's indictment
NeutralU.S News
The Justice Department has reversed its previous stance, confirming that the full grand jury did review the indictment against former FBI Director James Comey. This change follows comments from acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who indicated that not all grand jury members had seen the final version of the indictment, raising concerns about the indictment's validity.
DOJ Admits Full Grand Jury Never Saw Final Comey Indictment
NegativeU.S News
Former FBI Director James Comey and his defense team are attempting to dismiss charges of lying to Congress, claiming the prosecution is vindictive. During a recent hearing, the Justice Department acknowledged that not all grand jury members reviewed the final indictment, a significant oversight that could lead to the case being dismissed.
New hurdle in Comey case as Trump's Justice Department faces questions about the grand jury process
NegativeU.S News
The prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey has encountered another obstacle as the Justice Department faces scrutiny regarding the grand jury process used for his indictment. Questions have arisen about the presentation of evidence and the conduct of prosecutors, which could impact the integrity of the case.
Morning news brief
NeutralU.S News
The Justice Department's case against former FBI Director James Comey faces new challenges, including a federal judge's order for the release of grand jury records due to prosecutorial misconduct. Additionally, recent emails related to Jeffrey Epstein reveal influential individuals who sought his advice. Meanwhile, tech giant Nvidia has reported impressive earnings, indicating strong performance in the tech sector.
Ty Cobb says Bondi, Halligan should be disbarred over Comey case
NegativeU.S News
Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb stated that Attorney General Pam Bondi and interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan should be disbarred due to the Department of Justice's case against former FBI Director James Comey. Cobb expressed shock that the indictment was never properly returned, raising concerns about the integrity of the legal process.
Trump administration moves to roll back some Endangered Species Act protections
NegativeU.S News
The Trump administration has taken steps to weaken the Endangered Species Act, aiming to reinstate changes from the president's first term that were previously blocked by a federal judge. This move has raised concerns among environmentalists and advocates for wildlife protection.
Lindsey Halligan fires back at James Comey judge who claimed she’s a ‘puppet’
NegativeU.S News
Interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan suggested that the Biden-appointed judge overseeing the criminal case against former FBI Director James Comey violated judicial conduct rules by questioning if she was a 'puppet' of President Trump.
Federal grand juries, like the one in the Comey case, make major decisions in secret
NeutralU.S News
A dispute regarding the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey has drawn attention to the workings of grand juries in U.S. federal courts. The case highlights the secretive nature of grand jury proceedings and raises questions about the integrity of the indictment process.