Florida parent demands resignation of school board chair who celebrated Hulk Hogan's death

Descendants of Holocaust survivors in the U.S. are increasingly applying for German citizenship under a program that makes it easier for victims of Nazism and their families to reclaim ties to Germany. While some view it as a practical backup plan or symbolic reparations, others see it as a potential escape route amid rising anti-Semitism and political uncertainty under Donald Trump’s presidency.

Editor’s Note: This story highlights how historical trauma and current political climates shape personal decisions—some American Jews, wary of growing intolerance at home, are turning to Germany as a symbolic and practical safeguard. It’s a poignant twist of history, with descendants of those who fled the Nazis now considering Germany as a refuge.

Comedian Bill Maher sparked debate on his show "Real Time" by criticizing New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's "Marxist" views, calling him the most radical candidate the city has ever seen. Maher clashed with a Democratic congressman who defended Mamdani, highlighting the growing divide within progressive politics.

Editor’s Note: This story matters because it reflects the ongoing tension within the Democratic Party between moderate and far-left factions. Maher's comments—and the pushback they received—show how ideological battles are playing out in local elections, which could shape policies in one of America's most influential cities.

A federal appeals court has maintained a temporary block on the Trump administration's policy of conducting broad immigration sweeps in Southern California, agreeing with a lower court's decision that such indiscriminate stops and arrests are not permissible.

Editor’s Note: This ruling is a significant check on aggressive immigration enforcement tactics, ensuring that arrests and stops must be targeted rather than sweeping. For immigrant communities, it offers some reassurance against arbitrary detention, while critics of the policy see it as a win for civil liberties. The decision keeps the debate over immigration enforcement in the spotlight as legal battles continue.

A federal appeals court has upheld a temporary order preventing the Trump administration from carrying out broad, indiscriminate immigration sweeps in Southern California. The ruling maintains the block on random stops and arrests, reinforcing legal scrutiny over such enforcement tactics.

Editor’s Note: This decision matters because it limits aggressive immigration enforcement practices, offering some protection to immigrant communities in Southern California. It also signals ongoing judicial pushback against sweeping immigration crackdowns, keeping the debate over enforcement methods in the spotlight.

A Florida jury has ruled that Tesla must pay over $240 million to the families of victims involved in a deadly 2019 crash linked to its Autopilot feature. The decision, reached after a four-year legal battle, could pave the way for more lawsuits against Tesla over its self-driving technology.

Editor’s Note: This case highlights growing scrutiny over Tesla's Autopilot system and raises big questions about accountability in autonomous driving. With such a massive payout, it could embolden others to take legal action, potentially forcing Tesla—and the auto industry at large—to rethink how these technologies are tested and marketed. For consumers, it’s a stark reminder that "driver-assist" doesn’t mean "hands-off."