U.S. to withdraw from UN cultural agency UNESCO — again

This opinion piece makes the case that U.S. global health initiatives—especially programs like Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance) and malaria prevention efforts—deliver outstanding bang for the buck. Every dollar invested creates ripple effects, from saving lives to boosting economies in vulnerable regions.

Editor’s Note: At a time when foreign aid budgets often face scrutiny, this argument highlights how strategic health spending isn’t just charity—it’s a smart investment with measurable payoffs. If these programs truly work as well as described, cutting them could mean missing out on low-cost, high-impact solutions to global crises.

A heated debate is unfolding about whether medical schools should consider race in admissions—especially as AI tools, which may carry hidden biases, play a bigger role in healthcare. Some argue it’s a necessary step to correct systemic inequities, while others see it as reverse discrimination. The conversation reflects broader tensions over how to balance fairness, representation, and technology’s growing influence in sensitive areas like medicine.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about admissions policies—it’s about who gets to shape the future of medicine. As AI becomes a bigger player in diagnostics and treatment, the people designing and using those tools (and their lived experiences) matter. The debate forces us to ask: Can algorithms fix—or worsen—the biases we’re already struggling with?

This opinion piece draws a parallel between the current state of the National Education Association (NEA) and the civil rights activism in St. Augustine, Florida, in 1964—when 16 rabbis joined protests to support racial equality. The author suggests the teachers' union could similarly benefit from outside moral leadership to address its challenges, implying the NEA may have lost its way or needs reinvigoration.

Editor’s Note: The article taps into broader frustrations about the direction of teachers' unions, framing them as institutions in need of external intervention to realign with their original missions. It matters because debates over union influence in education are heating up, and this piece adds a historical lens to the conversation—suggesting that moral courage, not just policy, is what's missing.

This opinion piece argues that the turmoil in Butler, Pennsylvania, was predictable—a result of long-term mismanagement and what the author sees as the corrosive effects of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. The tone is critical, suggesting these factors eroded the organization's stability over time.

Editor’s Note: The story taps into broader debates about leadership failures and the polarizing role of DEI initiatives in institutions. Whether you agree or not, it’s a snapshot of how these issues are being framed in certain circles—and why they’ll keep sparking fierce arguments.

This opinion piece critiques President Trump's judicial nominations, arguing that Emil Bove—a recent pick—is a downgrade compared to the strong nominees from McConnell’s earlier influence. The author suggests this signals a worrying shift in the quality of judicial appointments.

Editor’s Note: Judicial appointments shape the courts for decades, so when an op-ed calls out a nominee as weaker than past picks, it’s not just inside baseball—it’s about the long-term direction of the legal system. If Trump wins again, this could foreshadow more contentious battles over who gets to wear the robe.