Pete Hegseth, who won over President Trump by defending troops accused of war crimes, is at the center of a debate about whether a September boat strike amounts to a war crime
NeutralU.S News

- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is at the center of a heated debate regarding a military strike in September that resulted in the deaths of survivors from an initial attack on an alleged drug boat. Hegseth defended the follow-up strike, claiming he did not see any survivors due to 'the fog of war,' a statement that has drawn significant scrutiny and criticism.
- This controversy is particularly significant for Hegseth, who has previously garnered support from President Trump by defending troops accused of war crimes. The current situation raises questions about his leadership and decision-making in military operations.
- The incident highlights ongoing tensions surrounding military engagement and the ethical implications of such strikes. Critics, including legal analysts, have called for accountability, suggesting that Hegseth's actions may constitute war crimes, reflecting broader concerns about military conduct and oversight in U.S. foreign policy.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System




