The Trump administration is cracking down on Harvard by revoking its ability to enroll international students. NBC News reports the move has drawn sharp criticism, with the university likely to push back.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s a sign of tightening restrictions on foreign students, which could ripple across higher education. Many universities rely on international enrollment, both culturally and financially, so this could hurt schools already struggling with pandemic-related losses. Plus, it adds fuel to the debate over how welcoming the U.S. should be to global talent.

The White House announced that a group of eight deported immigrants—mostly from Asian and Latino backgrounds—will stay in Djibouti for two weeks instead of continuing to South Sudan as originally planned. The delay is due to a court order, though details about the ruling or the immigrants' cases remain unclear.

Editor’s Note: This story highlights the messy, often opaque realities of U.S. deportation practices. Stuck in limbo in an East African transit point, these individuals underscore how legal and logistical hurdles can leave migrants in precarious situations—far from home, with little public clarity about their fate. It’s a reminder that deportation isn’t always a straightforward process, and the human toll often gets lost in the bureaucracy.

The Trump administration has abruptly stripped Harvard of its ability to admit international students, putting current foreign students at risk of losing their legal status unless they transfer to another school. Harvard is pushing back hard, calling the move both illegal and politically motivated.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just about Harvard—it signals a broader crackdown on foreign students in the U.S., which could disrupt thousands of lives and shake global confidence in American higher education. The retaliatory tone suggests politics may be driving policy more than practical concerns.

The Trump administration just threw a wrench into Harvard’s plans for international students, revoking the university’s ability to enroll them. This is the latest escalation in a tense back-and-forth between the government and the prestigious Ivy League school.

Editor’s Note: This move could have ripple effects far beyond Harvard—international students contribute billions to the U.S. economy and bring global talent to American campuses. It also signals a hardening stance on immigration under the current administration, with universities caught in the crossfire. For students and schools, it’s another layer of uncertainty in an already chaotic year.

The Trump administration just threw a major curveball at Harvard—DHS chief Kristi Noem yanked the university’s ability to enroll international students by revoking its certification under a key visa program. This isn’t just bureaucratic red tape; it’s a direct shot in Trump’s ongoing feud with the school, which has clashed with him over issues like immigration and pandemic policies. For now, Harvard’s global student pipeline is frozen, and the ripple effects could be messy.

Editor’s Note: Beyond the headline drama, this move could set a dangerous precedent. If the government can abruptly cut off a top university’s access to global talent over political spats, it sends a chilling message about education, diplomacy, and America’s appeal to international scholars. For students caught in the middle, it’s more than bureaucracy—it’s their futures in limbo.

The Trump administration has pulled the plug on Harvard’s ability to host international students, cutting off its student visa program after clashes over protests and the university’s refusal to share certain records. The move leaves affected students scrambling—they’ll either need to transfer to another school or risk losing their legal status in the U.S.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s a high-stakes power play in the ongoing tension between the federal government and universities over immigration enforcement. For international students, it’s a disruptive headache that could derail their education. And for other schools, it’s a warning shot: cooperate or risk losing access to global talent.

House Republicans are pushing to lock in funding for border security measures like hiring more personnel, building sections of the wall, and upgrading surveillance tech. They’re framing it as a continuation of Trump-era policies—and arguing it’s a victory for all Americans, not just their base.

Editor’s Note: Whether you see this as a win depends on where you stand on immigration. Supporters say tighter borders mean safety and order; critics call it political theater with humanitarian costs. Either way, it’s a sign that border security will stay a hot-button issue heading into the election.