Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin is accusing former President Trump of targeting Harvard University by revoking its ability to enroll international students, calling it an act of "vengeance." The move, carried out by the Department of Homeland Security, strips Harvard of its SEVP certification—a key program for foreign student visas. Raskin suggests this is retaliation, possibly linked to past tensions between Trump and elite institutions.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s a flashpoint in the broader debate over immigration and political retaliation. If the U.S. makes it harder for top schools to host international students, it could hurt academia, research, and even the economy, since many students stay and contribute after graduating. Plus, it raises questions about whether federal power is being used to settle personal or ideological scores.

The Wall Street Journal isn’t holding back—they’ve called out the Trump administration for what they see as a knee-jerk move against Harvard, stripping the university of its ability to enroll international students. The editorial board argues this decision by Homeland Security is reckless and undermines both education and America’s global standing.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s a flashpoint in the broader debate over immigration and education. Blocking elite universities from attracting global talent could hurt the U.S. economy and its reputation as a hub for innovation. The WSJ’s sharp criticism signals pushback from even traditionally conservative-leaning institutions against hardline policies.

The Trump administration tried to block Harvard from enrolling and hosting foreign students, but a judge quickly put that on hold after Harvard sued, arguing the move was unconstitutional. A Harvard lecturer highlighted the panic this caused, noting that over a quarter of the university’s students are international—a huge chunk of its community.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s part of a broader crackdown on foreign students and workers in the U.S., which could disrupt education, research, and even the economy. For a school like Harvard, where international students make up a significant portion of the campus, the stakes are especially high. The legal fight also underscores how polarized U.S. immigration policy has become, with universities now caught in the crossfire.

The Trump administration recently took aim at Harvard, using it as an example to criticize the influx of international students coming to the U.S. for college. The article dives into the numbers—how many foreign students study at Harvard and nationwide—to give a clearer picture of this often-debated issue.

Editor’s Note: International students are a hot-button topic in U.S. politics, with some arguing they take spots from domestic applicants while others highlight their economic and cultural contributions. This piece sheds light on the actual scale of the trend, which could shape debates over immigration and university policies.

A federal judge just hit pause on the Trump administration’s move to bar Harvard from enrolling international students. The judge stepped in after Harvard sued, arguing the policy was unconstitutional—and for now, foreign students at the Ivy League school can breathe a sigh of relief.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s a high-stakes clash over how the U.S. treats foreign students, who contribute billions to the economy and bring global talent to campuses. The ruling signals pushback against hardline immigration policies, at least temporarily, and keeps the door open for thousands of students caught in the crossfire.

The Pentagon's newly appointed spokesperson is under fire for promoting an antisemitic conspiracy theory in the past, raising concerns about their suitability for the role. Meanwhile, Harvard University is taking legal action against the Trump administration for revoking its ability to enroll international students, calling the move unconstitutional and retaliatory.

Editor’s Note: This story matters because it highlights ongoing tensions within the government—both in terms of personnel controversies and policy battles. The Pentagon spokesperson's past remarks could undermine trust in official communications, while Harvard's lawsuit reflects broader clashes over immigration and education policies. Both issues signal deeper divisions in U.S. leadership and institutions.

A federal judge just put the brakes on the Trump administration's attempt to bar foreign students from attending Harvard, siding with the university in this high-profile clash. Judge Allison Burroughs (an Obama appointee) agreed with Harvard’s stance, marking another chapter in the ongoing tension between the president and the elite institution.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s part of a bigger fight over immigration policies and how they impact higher education. The ruling signals that courts may push back against strict student visa rules, which could affect thousands of international students nationwide. For now, foreign students at Harvard can breathe a little easier.

The article suggests that Trump's recent order restricting foreign students could severely impact Harvard and other elite universities by deterring top international talent. It frames the move as potentially damaging to America's academic prestige and global competitiveness.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just about visas—it's about whether the U.S. will remain the top destination for the world's best minds. If bright students can't study here, they'll go elsewhere, weakening American universities and innovation in the long run. It’s a high-stakes gamble with education and influence.

A federal judge just hit pause on the Trump administration’s attempt to bar Harvard from admitting international students, calling the move into question just one day after it was announced. Harvard had slammed the order as unconstitutional, and the court’s quick intervention suggests the policy might not hold up under scrutiny.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s a high-stakes clash over immigration, education, and executive power. The ruling (for now) protects thousands of international students from sudden deportation threats, but it also signals a broader legal fight ahead. For universities and students alike, the outcome could reshape who gets to study in the U.S. and how much say the government has in that process.