Top evangelical Christian leaders are publicly applauding former President Trump for his unwavering backing of Israel during its escalating conflict with Iran. They’re framing the U.S.-Israel relationship as both a geopolitical necessity and a biblical imperative, calling for continued solidarity with Israel in what they describe as an existential struggle.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about politics—it’s about how faith, foreign policy, and domestic voter bases intersect. Evangelical support has long been a cornerstone of U.S. backing for Israel, and with tensions flaring in the Middle East, these leaders are reinforcing that alliance as a moral and strategic priority. Their vocal endorsement could sway conservative voters and shape the broader conversation around America’s role in the region.

President Trump touched down in Canada for the G7 summit, where global leaders are expected to tackle the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez notes that Trump might find himself in the hot seat, pressured by allies to help cool things down between the two nations.

Editor’s Note: The G7 isn’t just about economics—it’s a high-stakes stage where leaders juggle crises in real time. With the Israel-Iran conflict simmering, Trump’s presence adds another layer to an already tense gathering. How he navigates it could shape not just Middle East dynamics but also global perceptions of U.S. leadership.

This opinion piece argues that former President Trump has taken significant steps to support Jewish communities, both by backing Israel against Iran and cracking down on antisemitism in U.S. colleges. The author frames these actions as a "mitzvah"—a good deed—suggesting Trump is actively aligning himself with Jewish interests.

Editor’s Note: The article matters because it highlights how political figures leverage support for Israel and Jewish causes as part of their platform. Whether you agree or not, it’s a reminder of how U.S. leaders position themselves on international conflicts and domestic social issues—especially with an eye toward voter appeal.

According to an AP report, former President Trump reportedly pushed back against an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The White House was allegedly informed by Israeli officials that a credible plot was in the works, but Trump’s administration rejected the idea. The details of the plan and the exact reasons for the rejection remain unclear, but the revelation highlights the high-stakes tensions between Israel and Iran—and the U.S.’s role in navigating them.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about a rejected assassination plot—it’s a peek into the volatile dynamics between Israel, Iran, and the U.S. Had this plan moved forward, it could’ve sparked a major escalation in the Middle East. The fact that Trump reportedly shut it down suggests caution (or at least hesitation) in provoking Iran directly, even during his hawkish tenure. For readers, it’s a reminder of how covert operations and geopolitical brinkmanship often play out behind closed doors.

Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat, is calling for Congress to have a say before the U.S. gets dragged into another conflict with Iran, echoing President Trump’s long-standing criticism of "endless wars." With tensions flaring in the Middle East, Kaine’s push highlights rare bipartisan agreement on avoiding another costly, open-ended military engagement—even as the two parties clash on nearly everything else.

Editor’s Note: War fatigue is real, and this story shows how it’s bridging political divides—for now. Kaine’s move isn’t just about Iran; it’s a sign that lawmakers, regardless of party, are wary of repeating the Iraq and Afghanistan playbook. But with so much volatility in the region, the bigger question is whether Congress can actually steer the ship or if events on the ground will force their hand.

Israel has launched strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, accusing Tehran of secretly developing nuclear weapons—a claim Iran strongly denies. So far, international monitors haven’t detected any radiation spikes at the targeted sites. Tensions have been simmering since the U.S. pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal, prompting Iran to ramp up uranium enrichment. An expert interview with Dr. Rouzbeh Parsi suggests that while Israel can strike, it can’t force a regime change in Iran without crucial U.S. involvement.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another flare-up in the Middle East—it’s a high-stakes game with global consequences. If Iran’s nuclear program escalates unchecked, it could trigger a regional arms race or even a broader conflict. The U.S. role here is pivotal, but its strategy (or lack thereof) could make things messier. For anyone watching global security, this is a slow-motion crisis with no easy off-ramps.

President Trump and Canadian PM Mark Carney are meeting again at the G7 summit, but things aren’t exactly friendly—Trump’s recent tariffs and jokes about Canada being the "51st U.S. state" have ratcheted up tensions. Meanwhile, Israel is making bold claims about dominating Tehran’s airspace, adding another layer of geopolitical drama to the day’s headlines.

Editor’s Note: Trade spats between allies like the U.S. and Canada might seem like bureaucratic squabbles, but they can ripple through economies and strain long-standing partnerships. And Israel’s air superiority claim? That’s a stark reminder of how quickly regional tensions can escalate. Both stories highlight how fragile international relations can be—even at a summit meant for cooperation.

The FTSE 100 stock index is flirting with a record high, while oil prices dip—both reacting to reports that Iran might be open to talks with Israel after recent escalations. Investors seem cautiously optimistic that tensions could ease, but the situation remains volatile.

Editor’s Note: When geopolitical tensions simmer down, markets often breathe a sigh of relief. A potential de-escalation between Iran and Israel could mean less disruption to global oil supplies and steadier investor nerves. But with the Middle East, things can change fast—so don’t pop the champagne just yet.

The fighting between Israel and Iran is dragging into its fourth day with no end in sight. Both sides launched new attacks on Monday, and the rising death toll makes it clear this won’t be a quick or easy fight for either.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another flare-up—it’s a dangerous escalation with real human costs. The longer it goes on, the higher the risk of wider regional instability, which could ripple out to global security and energy markets. People are dying, and the world is watching nervously.