Five members of the Proud Boys—a far-right group known for its role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot—are suing the U.S. government, claiming their constitutional rights were violated during their prosecution. The lawsuit, led by former chairman Enrique Tarrio, argues that their legal treatment was unfair. This comes after multiple convictions tied to the 2021 attack, which sought to overturn the 2020 election results.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another Jan. 6 lawsuit—it’s a high-stakes challenge from a group already convicted of seditious conspiracy. If the case gains traction, it could fuel broader debates about prosecutorial overreach and free speech, while also testing the legal fallout from one of America’s most politically charged events. For critics, it’s a brazen attempt to rewrite accountability; for supporters, it’s a fight against perceived government bias. Either way, it keeps Jan. 6 in the headlines.

A former D.C. police officer, Shane Lamond, is headed to prison for 18 months after getting caught lying about leaking sensitive information to Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the Proud Boys. Lamond was convicted of obstructing justice and repeatedly lying to investigators—essentially trying to cover his tracks while feeding info to a far-right extremist.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another corruption case—it’s a stark example of how deep the ties between law enforcement and extremist groups can go. Lamond’s actions undermined trust in police integrity, especially during a time when the Proud Boys were actively involved in political violence. It’s a reminder that accountability matters, even (or especially) for those sworn to uphold the law.

A retired D.C. police officer got an 18-month prison sentence for lying to investigators about sharing confidential info with the ex-leader of the Proud Boys. The far-right leader was being probed for burning a Black Lives Matter banner in D.C., and the officer’s leaks could’ve compromised the case.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about one bad apple—it’s a stark example of how extremism can infiltrate institutions meant to protect the public. When cops break trust to aid violent groups, it erodes faith in the system and raises scary questions about who’s really calling the shots.

Five members of the Proud Boys—a far-right group known for its role in the January 6 Capitol riot—are suing the U.S. government, arguing their constitutional rights were violated during their prosecutions. They’re demanding hefty payouts, including $100 million in punitive damages, plus interest. The lawsuit, filed Friday, adds another layer to the legal fallout from the insurrection.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about money—it’s a high-stakes challenge to how the government handles cases tied to January 6. If the lawsuit gains traction, it could embolden others to contest their charges, potentially reshaping accountability for the Capitol attack. For now, it keeps the debate over justice, free speech, and extremism in the spotlight.

A retired D.C. police officer got an 18-month prison sentence after admitting he lied to investigators about leaking sensitive police info to the former leader of the Proud Boys, an extremist group. The Proud Boys leader was already under investigation for burning a Black Lives Matter banner stolen from a church. The officer’s actions undermined trust in law enforcement and raised concerns about far-right infiltration in police departments.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about one bad actor—it’s a stark reminder of how extremism can seep into institutions meant to protect the public. When officers abuse their access to help hate groups, it erodes faith in policing and fuels broader fears about bias and corruption. The case also highlights ongoing tensions between law enforcement and far-right movements, especially after the Capitol riot and other high-profile incidents.

The former leader of the Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio, and four others convicted for their roles in the January 6 Capitol riot are suing the federal government. They claim their rights were violated during prosecution—despite some having received pardons or sentence reductions from Trump.

Editor’s Note: This lawsuit isn’t just about these individuals—it’s another ripple in the ongoing fallout from January 6. If they succeed, it could embolden others to challenge their prosecutions, keeping the legal and political drama around the insurrection alive. It also highlights how deeply divided the country remains over accountability for that day.

Five members of the far-right Proud Boys group are suing the federal government, claiming prosecutors used illegal tactics—like withholding evidence and coercing plea deals—to go after people charged in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. The lawsuit argues these methods violated their constitutional rights.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about the Proud Boys—it’s part of a bigger debate over how the Justice Department has handled Jan. 6 cases. If the lawsuit gains traction, it could fuel claims of government overreach and even influence other defendants to challenge their own prosecutions. At the same time, critics see it as another attempt to downplay accountability for the Capitol attack. Either way, it keeps the legal fallout from that day in the spotlight.