Harvard University is taking legal action against the Trump administration over its new policy that could force foreign students to leave the U.S. if their schools move classes entirely online. Harvard claims the move is politically motivated—punishment for the university’s refusal to comply with Trump’s demands on free speech and other issues. The lawsuit argues the policy is unconstitutional and harmful to both students and academic institutions.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about visas—it’s a high-stakes clash between the White House and higher education over politics, autonomy, and who gets to call the shots. For international students, it adds another layer of uncertainty during an already chaotic time. And for schools, it raises bigger questions about how much the government can interfere in academia.

Belgium’s Princess Elisabeth, who’s next in line for the throne, just finished her first year of grad school at Harvard—but now, Trump’s new ban on foreign students might force her to leave. The policy could disrupt her education and add another layer of chaos to international students caught in the crossfire of U.S. immigration rules.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about royalty—it’s a snapshot of how abrupt policy shifts can upend lives, even for someone with privilege. If a future queen isn’t immune to the fallout, imagine the strain on ordinary students. It also highlights the growing tension between global education and nationalist policies.

Former President Donald Trump is turning up the heat on Apple, threatening to slap a 25% tariff on iPhones if they aren't manufactured in the U.S. The announcement sent shockwaves through the market, wiping out roughly $70 billion from Apple's stock value in a single day. Trump's move appears to be part of his broader push to bring manufacturing jobs back to American soil—a recurring theme in his economic policy playbook.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just about iPhones—it's a high-stakes gamble that could reshape global supply chains. If enforced, the tariff could make iPhones significantly more expensive, hitting consumers' wallets and potentially disrupting Apple's carefully calibrated production network. It also signals a return to Trump's aggressive trade tactics, which could spark fresh tensions with China and other key trading partners. For businesses and investors, it's a reminder of how quickly political rhetoric can translate into market turmoil.

Former President Donald Trump is stirring the pot again on trade policy, this time targeting the European Union and Apple. In a social media post, he floated the idea of slapping a hefty 50% tariff on EU goods starting June 1—a move that could escalate trade tensions. He also took a direct shot at Apple, warning its CEO to shift iPhone production to the U.S. or face consequences. This isn’t just talk; Trump has a history of aggressive trade tactics, and if he returns to office, these threats could become reality.

Editor’s Note: Trade wars aren’t just political theater—they hit wallets. Higher tariffs on EU goods could mean pricier imports for Americans, from cheese to cars. And forcing Apple to manufacture iPhones stateside might sound patriotic, but it could spike costs or disrupt supply chains. Whether you love or hate Trump’s approach, this signals a potential return to the economic turbulence of his first term—with global ripple effects.

Harvard University is taking legal action against the Trump administration over a new policy barring foreign students from enrolling, calling it an unconstitutional retaliation after the school refused to comply with White House demands. The Ivy League institution argues the ban is politically motivated and harmful to academic freedom.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about visas or enrollment—it’s a high-stakes clash between the government and higher education over who gets to set the rules. If the ban stands, it could reshape campus diversity, research talent, and even the global reputation of U.S. universities. For students, it’s a nerve-wracking limbo; for schools, it’s a fight for autonomy.

Harvard University is taking legal action against the Trump administration over its recent policy banning foreign students from enrolling in U.S. universities if their classes are entirely online. The lawsuit argues the rule is arbitrary and harmful, putting international students at risk of deportation and disrupting their education.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Harvard—it’s a high-stakes fight over how the U.S. treats international students, who contribute billions to the economy and enrich campuses. The policy could force thousands to leave the country or scramble for in-person classes during a pandemic, adding chaos to an already stressful year. Harvard’s lawsuit could set a precedent for other schools pushing back.

House Republicans just barely pushed through a massive bill packed with Trump-era tax ideas, budget slashes, and changes to major federal programs. After weeks of backroom deals, all-night debates, and razor-thin margins (215-214, with almost no Democratic support), the proposal now heads to the Senate—where its fate is still uncertain.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another partisan vote—it’s a high-stakes preview of GOP priorities heading into the election. If it gains traction, it could reshape taxes, social programs, and government spending. But with such a narrow margin, even small disagreements in the Senate could sink the whole thing. Buckle up.

The White House is standing firm against Harvard, dismissing the university's lawsuit as "frivolous" after the Trump administration revoked its ability to enroll international students. Harvard’s president argues the school won’t back down, calling the move "unlawful" and "unwarranted." Meanwhile, the ongoing clash adds to the uncertainty for international students caught in the crossfire.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just a bureaucratic spat—it’s a high-stakes fight over who controls access to American education. With Harvard digging in and the administration refusing to budge, thousands of international students face disrupted plans, and other universities might be next. It’s a messy battle with real consequences for students and the future of global academic exchange.

VP Vance told Naval Academy grads that Trump’s second term signals a sharp turn away from decades of U.S. "meddling" abroad, framing it as the close of a failed experiment. He doubled down on Trump’s "America First" approach, praising the ex-president’s Middle East diplomacy while slamming past administrations for overreliance on military intervention.

Editor’s Note: Vance’s speech isn’t just a pat on Trump’s back—it’s a direct challenge to the post-Cold War consensus that the U.S. should actively shape global politics. Whether you see this as isolationism or pragmatism, it’s a clear signal that a potential Trump 2.0 would redefine America’s role in the world, likely pulling back from alliances and interventions. That’s a big deal for everything from Ukraine aid to Taiwan’s security.