Former Senator Kelly Loeffler is championing Trump’s proposed "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" as a potential game-changer for small businesses and the broader economy. The legislation aims to block tax increases, boost U.S. manufacturing, and lure millions of workers back into the labor force—a combo that Loeffler argues could solidify Trump’s economic impact for years to come.

Editor’s Note: If this bill gains traction, it could reshape the economic landscape for small businesses and workers, especially in manufacturing. With debates over taxes and labor shortages still hot, this proposal taps into two major pain points—making it a story worth watching, whether you love or hate Trump’s policies.

This week, President Trump is zeroing in on pushing through a major legislative package—dubbed the "big, beautiful bill"—before the Fourth of July deadline. Alongside domestic priorities, his administration is juggling Middle East tensions, including fallout from recent Iranian strikes and possible Gaza ceasefire talks in Washington.

Editor’s Note: The story highlights the high-stakes balancing act of the Trump administration as it races against a symbolic deadline to pass significant legislation while managing volatile foreign policy challenges. Whether the bill succeeds or stalls could set the tone for the rest of the political season—and the optics around Independence Day won’t hurt either. Meanwhile, the Middle East developments remind us how domestic and international agendas often collide in unpredictable ways.

Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who had previously been critical of President Trump's spending plans, explains his last-minute decision to vote in favor of the president's agenda. In an interview with NPR, Johnson discusses what changed his mind, suggesting a mix of political strategy and policy concessions played a role.

Editor’s Note: Johnson's shift is a small but telling moment in the broader tug-of-war within the GOP over spending and loyalty to Trump. It highlights how even skeptical lawmakers sometimes fall in line—whether due to party pressure, deal-making, or shifting priorities. For voters, it’s a reminder that political decisions often hinge on behind-the-scenes maneuvering as much as public principles.

The article highlights the Trump administration's foreign policy approach, framing it as a return to "peace through strength." It suggests the strategy focuses on advancing U.S. interests while bolstering alliances and opening doors in regions like the Middle East. Supporters might see this as a confident, America-first shift, while critics could argue it risks alienating global partners.

Editor’s Note: Love it or hate it, this doctrine signals a clear direction for America's global role—one that prioritizes hard power and strategic deals. For readers, it’s a window into how Trump’s team plans to navigate complex international relationships, with ripple effects for trade, security, and diplomacy. Whether it delivers stability or friction remains to be seen.

President Trump is on the verge of a major political moment as the Senate prepares to vote on what could be his administration's most significant legislative achievement. He's calling it a "big, beautiful" win, but there are still obstacles that could derail it—so the outcome isn't guaranteed yet.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just another policy debate—it's a make-or-break moment for Trump's agenda. If the Senate passes this bill, it'll be a huge boost for his presidency, especially after earlier struggles to push major legislation through Congress. But if it fails, it could fuel criticism that he can't deliver on big promises. Either way, the stakes are high.

This piece dives into the heated debate over whether the Trump era was uniquely chaotic or if people are simply forgetting past political turbulence. It questions whether today's polarized climate is distorting our perception of history, suggesting that every presidency has its share of upheaval—but Trump's style made it feel more relentless.

Editor’s Note: Whether you loved or loathed Trump, this isn’t just about him—it’s about how we remember (or misremember) political drama. If we overstate the chaos of one era, we risk underestimating the challenges of others—or missing patterns that keep repeating. It’s a reminder to step back and ask: Is this actually unprecedented, or does it just feel that way?

After a brief standoff, trade talks between the U.S. and Canada are back on—but only because Canada dropped its proposed tax on big tech companies. President Trump had slammed the tax as an "attack" on the U.S. and halted negotiations, but Canada’s reversal smoothed things over (for now).

Editor’s Note: Trade spats between these neighbors are nothing new, but this one highlights how sensitive digital economy policies can be. Canada blinked first, but the tension shows how hard it is to balance national interests with keeping trade flowing—especially when tech giants are caught in the middle.

Florida Rep. Greg Steube is furious with the Senate parliamentarian—a nonpartisan referee for procedural rules—after she blocked parts of Trump’s sweeping legislative package. Steube claims unelected staff shouldn’t have that power, insisting lawmakers should call the shots.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just insider baseball—it’s a flashpoint in the ongoing fight over who controls the legislative process. When rules officials nix big proposals, it fuels accusations of "deep state" interference, especially among Trump allies. Steube’s outrage signals more clashes ahead as Republicans try to push their agenda through a narrowly divided Congress.

President Trump is urging Republican senators to support his major legislative bill, dubbed the "big beautiful bill," even as new projections from the budget office warn it could lead to significant losses in healthcare coverage. Meanwhile, tensions rise as Trump reportedly considers pressuring journalists to reveal their sources over a controversial Iran report.

Editor’s Note: This story highlights the high-stakes battle over healthcare policy and press freedom in the U.S. If the bill passes with these projected consequences, millions could lose coverage—a major political and social issue. The threat to journalists also raises concerns about government transparency and free speech, making this a critical moment for both policy and democratic norms.