President Trump is heading to West Point to give a speech to this year’s graduating cadets—his first military commencement address since taking office again. It’s a high-profile moment, blending politics, tradition, and the symbolic relationship between the commander-in-chief and the armed forces.

Editor’s Note: Presidential speeches at military academies are always noteworthy—they’re a mix of inspiration, policy hints, and sometimes political messaging. With Trump back in office, this address could signal his priorities for defense or even set the tone for how he engages with the military moving forward. Whether it’s a routine tradition or something more pointed, people will be watching.

President Trump is significantly reducing the role of the National Security Council (NSC) during his second term, marking a notable shift in how foreign policy decisions are made. The NSC, historically a key advisory body for presidents on major diplomatic and security issues, is losing influence under this administration.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just bureaucratic reshuffling—it signals a real change in how critical security decisions get made. The NSC has been a stabilizing force in past administrations, so sidelining it could mean more unpredictable foreign policy moves ahead. For anyone watching global affairs, this is a big deal.

Over 100 National Security Council staffers have either been let go or reassigned to other government posts as part of a major shake-up. This isn’t just routine turnover—it’s a deliberate restructuring effort, though the exact reasons behind the moves aren’t fully spelled out yet.

Editor’s Note: Big staffing changes at the NSC could signal a shift in how national security decisions are handled—whether it’s streamlining operations, changing priorities, or just clearing house. Since these folks help shape critical policies, their departure (or reshuffling) might ripple out to how the U.S. tackles global challenges. Worth keeping an eye on.

President Trump pulled out all the stops—charm, pressure, and even some profanity—to strong-arm House Republicans into passing a huge tax bill. The chaotic push highlights his tight control over the party, even as some lawmakers hesitated.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about taxes—it’s a snapshot of Trump’s leadership style and how far he’s willing to go to bend Washington to his will. The bill’s impact will ripple through the economy, but the real story here is the raw political maneuvering behind it.

Booz Allen Hamilton, a major government consulting firm, is slashing 2,500 jobs as federal spending tightens under the Trump administration. The cuts come as contracts dry up, and the company expects a 3% hit to its 2026 revenue—a big deal since most of its money comes from government work.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another round of layoffs—it’s a ripple effect from shifting political priorities. When the feds pull back spending, contractors like Booz Allen take the hit first, and thousands of workers pay the price. It’s a reminder of how tightly some businesses are tied to government budgets, and how quickly changes at the top can shake the ground beneath employees.

Despite signing an executive order back in February to explore ways to make IVF more affordable, President Trump hasn’t taken concrete steps to actually expand access to the treatment. NBC News reports that his campaign promise to help families struggling with fertility issues remains unfulfilled, leaving many wondering if action will come before the election.

Editor’s Note: IVF is a lifeline for countless families, but it’s often prohibitively expensive. Trump’s lack of follow-through means hopeful parents are still stuck navigating high costs with little federal support. This isn’t just about policy—it’s about real people’s lives and the gap between political promises and tangible results.

The Trump administration is reportedly slashing the size and influence of the US National Security Council (NSC), cutting staff down to just a few dozen and shifting more authority to the State and Defense Departments. Sources say termination notices went out Friday to employees handling major geopolitical issues, signaling a dramatic overhaul of the once-powerful agency.

Editor’s Note: The NSC plays a key role in coordinating America's foreign policy and crisis responses—so shrinking it this drastically could mean big shifts in how the US handles global threats. Supporters might argue it streamlines decision-making, but critics will likely see it as weakening expertise at a time when international tensions (from Russia to China to the Middle East) are running high. Either way, this move could reshape US security strategy for years.

President Trump signed executive orders aimed at dramatically expanding the U.S. nuclear power industry, with plans to quadruple its output. The move includes rolling back some health and environmental regulations that critics argue are safeguards, not roadblocks. Trump framed it as cutting red tape, but opponents worry it could compromise safety for speed.

Editor’s Note: Nuclear power is a polarizing issue—clean in terms of emissions but risky if oversight weakens. Trump’s push could accelerate energy independence and reduce fossil fuel reliance, but sidelining health and environmental reviews might spark legal battles and public backlash. It’s a high-stakes gamble: faster nuclear growth vs. potential safety trade-offs.

The Trump administration is shaking up the National Security Council (NSC) just weeks after Mike Waltz, the former National Security Advisor, stepped down. While the details of the overhaul aren’t fully clear yet, the move suggests a significant restructuring of the team responsible for advising the president on critical security and foreign policy issues.

Editor’s Note: Changes to the NSC aren’t unusual when administrations shift personnel, but this comes at a time when global tensions—from Russia to China—are high. How this restructuring plays out could impact U.S. foreign policy decisions, so it’s worth keeping an eye on who steps into these roles and what direction they take.