20% tourist spike in May as Hong Kong welcomed more than 4 million visitors

According to a report, former U.S. President Donald Trump blocked an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Trump apparently viewed the operation as too risky, fearing it could escalate tensions in an already volatile region. The decision highlights the delicate balance of power and diplomacy in the Middle East.

Editor’s Note: This story matters because it reveals the behind-the-scenes tensions between allies and the high-stakes decisions that shape global security. If true, it shows how even aggressive actors like Israel sometimes get reined in by bigger geopolitical concerns—and how Trump, despite his often combative rhetoric, weighed the risks of provoking Iran. It’s a reminder that even in secret, the rules of escalation still apply.

Tribes from Nagaland, India, are in talks with Oxford’s Pitt Rivers Museum to reclaim the remains of their ancestors—skulls and other body parts—taken during British colonial rule and displayed as "trophies" for decades. This effort is part of a broader global push by Indigenous communities to repatriate stolen cultural and human artifacts.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about returning bones—it’s about healing historical wounds. Colonial museums are finally facing pressure to right past wrongs, and for these tribes, bringing their ancestors home is a step toward justice and dignity. It’s a small but meaningful shift in how we reckon with the brutal legacies of empire.

This opinion piece argues that former President Trump has taken significant steps to support Jewish communities, both by backing Israel against Iran and taking a hard stance against antisemitism on college campuses. The author frames these actions as positive contributions ("mitzvahs") to Jewish causes.

Editor’s Note: Whether you agree with Trump or not, this piece highlights how his policies on Israel and campus antisemitism resonate with certain Jewish and conservative audiences. It’s a reminder of how his approach to foreign and domestic issues continues to shape political alliances—and why his stance on these topics could matter in future elections.

As the G7 summit kicks off in Canada’s Rocky Mountains, President Trump’s meeting with Canadian PM Justin Trudeau is overshadowed by simmering trade tensions and the escalating Iran-Israel crisis. Meanwhile, back in the U.S., a federal judge is deciding whether to block Trump’s controversial plan to bar foreign students from studying at Harvard—a move that could ripple through higher education and immigration policy.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another diplomatic meet-and-greet. The G7 summit is unfolding against a backdrop of global instability, and Trump’s policies—both abroad and at home—are under intense scrutiny. The Harvard case could set a precedent for how far the administration can go in restricting foreign students, while the Middle East tensions threaten to derail any hope of a focused economic agenda. It’s a high-stakes moment for U.S. leadership.

A recent audit presented to UK MPs revealed that Asian and Pakistani men are disproportionately represented in local data on grooming gang cases. Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper highlighted that some organizations avoided addressing the issue due to fears of being labeled racist or stoking tensions. Meanwhile, Labour leader Keir Starmer has launched a new investigation into grooming gangs amid political pressure.

Editor’s Note: This story touches on a sensitive but critical issue—how authorities handle racially charged crime data. The findings suggest systemic hesitancy to confront uncomfortable truths, which could hinder effective policy responses. Starmer's new probe signals political urgency, but it also raises questions about balancing accountability with community relations. It’s a messy, high-stakes debate with real-world consequences for victims and marginalized groups.